2023
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5301.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving nomenclatural problems of genus-group names of the cuckoo-wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae): objectively invalid and unavailable names, new type-species designations, new names, a new genus and new synonymies

Abstract: Information is provided for 143 objectively invalid or unavailable genus-group names used in Chrysididae; 34 are objectively invalid, of which 18 are junior homonyms (five of these are also currently junior subjective synonyms), 18 are junior objective synonyms (two of these are also junior homonyms) of which seven are unjustified emendations, and two are unnecessary replacement names. The remaining 109 names are unavailable; 96 are incorrect subsequent spellings, most of them were originally lapsus calami or … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 115 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the framework of a comprehensive revision of Chrysididae genera initiated following the molecular phylogeny published by Pauli et al (2019) and continued by Rosa et al (2023), this contribution aims to highlight a specific abnormality that occasionally affects the chrysidid metasoma. Additionally, the intent is to propose a new synonymy for a genus that was initially described based on a single aberrant specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the framework of a comprehensive revision of Chrysididae genera initiated following the molecular phylogeny published by Pauli et al (2019) and continued by Rosa et al (2023), this contribution aims to highlight a specific abnormality that occasionally affects the chrysidid metasoma. Additionally, the intent is to propose a new synonymy for a genus that was initially described based on a single aberrant specimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%