2013 Sixth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icaci.2013.6748466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving NoC mapping problem with improved particle swarm algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many types of heuristics, iterative improvement, probabilistic, integer linear and non-linear programming approaches and other types of algorithms can be adopted for NoC mapping [13]. In recent years, various algorithms for NoC mapping have emerged such as branch and bound, genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA), particle swarm, Tabu search algorithm and so on [5,7,[14][15][16][17][18]. There are also some specialised algorithms for NoC mapping [2,8,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many types of heuristics, iterative improvement, probabilistic, integer linear and non-linear programming approaches and other types of algorithms can be adopted for NoC mapping [13]. In recent years, various algorithms for NoC mapping have emerged such as branch and bound, genetic algorithm (GA), simulated annealing (SA), particle swarm, Tabu search algorithm and so on [5,7,[14][15][16][17][18]. There are also some specialised algorithms for NoC mapping [2,8,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part, practical outcomes have been made available to indicate the benefit of the suggested plan. We compare the technique with two other procedures, namely, genetic and PSO (Li et al, 2013) using MATLAB software. Section 4.1 discusses the simulation tool.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the modeling the architecture, the following quantities are considered as characteristic edge for each p i,j ; parameters such as number, type, speed, communications links and memory size. Mapping the tasks graph g = G(vertix, edge) to topology graph g 0 = G(tile, path) with the mapping function is determined (Li et al, 2013;Saifutdinova et al, 2016). Because of an APCG, IP collection and a CACG, which content IP # R, a mapping scheme MAP from APCG to CACG can be found, such that:…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the validity of the mapping algorithm we proposed, the simulated annealing algorithm [21], particle swarm algorithm [22], and genetic algorithm [23] are implemented, respectively. For fair comparison, the same power and delay models described in Subsection 3.2 are used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%