2019
DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2018.1556661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving mixed-integer nonlinear programmes using adaptively refined mixed-integer linear programmes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generalized Benders Decomposition (GBD) [13,15] solves a convex MINLP by iteratively solving NLP and MIP sub-problems. The adaptive MIP OAmethod is based on the refinement of MIP relaxations by projecting infeasible points onto a feasible set, see [5,8].…”
Section: Convex Minlp-methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generalized Benders Decomposition (GBD) [13,15] solves a convex MINLP by iteratively solving NLP and MIP sub-problems. The adaptive MIP OAmethod is based on the refinement of MIP relaxations by projecting infeasible points onto a feasible set, see [5,8].…”
Section: Convex Minlp-methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…because of data or model errors. Since most MIP solvers, like SCIP, are able to detect the infeasibility of a model, a feasibility flag can be returned after solving (5), which can be used to stop DECOA, if the MINLP model (1) is infeasible.…”
Section: Oa Master Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin and Möller [115], Martin et al [116], and Möller [120] investigate this approach and Geißler et al [61][62][63][64] and Morsi [122] show how to maintain the relaxation property. After checking for feasibility again, possible refinement steps are investigated by Burlacu et al [24] and Geißler [60]. The linearization methods itself are presented in Dantzig [41] and Markowitz and Manne [114].…”
Section: Convex Mixed-integer Nonlinear Programming Convexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, (penalty) alternating direction methods are used to combine mixed-integer and continuous solution strategies in a hybrid approach in Geißler et al [65][66][67]. By far the most common approaches in the literature are (piecewise) linearization techniques for obtaining MIP models that can be solved with state-of-the-art MIP solvers to global optimality; see, e.g., Burlacu et al [24], Geißler [60], Geißler et al [62][63][64], Martin and Möller [115], Martin et al [116], Möller [120], and Morsi [122]. Besides that, we also use these (piecewise) linearization techniques to couple the gas network with an electricity system, where the latter is a unit commitment problem: The content of the article is not part of this thesis.…”
Section: Literature Survey: Solving Gas Transport Optimization Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geißler, Morsi, Schewe, and Schmidt (2015) use piecewise linear approximation to relax the mixed-integer nonlinear model with a given tolerance error. Burlacu, Geißler, and Schewe (2019) base their work on Geißler et al (2012) and solve an MINLP by solving a sequence of MIP relaxations with gradually increasing accuracy. They use the German network with more than 500 nodes to show the advantages of their work compared with the existing MINLP solvers.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%