2016
DOI: 10.1080/10556788.2016.1165676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving linear generalized Nash equilibrium problems numerically

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…of the form Ax ≤ b for some suitable matrix A and vector b." In fact, many existing generalized Nash game models adopt affine coupling constraints, as well documented in Schiro, Pang & Shanbhag (2013) and Dreves & Sudermann (2016).…”
Section: Game Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the form Ax ≤ b for some suitable matrix A and vector b." In fact, many existing generalized Nash game models adopt affine coupling constraints, as well documented in Schiro, Pang & Shanbhag (2013) and Dreves & Sudermann (2016).…”
Section: Game Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that, this is a direct consequence of the definition of Pareto optimality. Moreover, we can prove that any solution of problem (9) is a Pareto optimum of problem (15).…”
Section: Methods Based On Potential Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3 Let x be a 0-approximate global solution of problem (9), then x is a Pareto optimum of problem (15).…”
Section: Methods Based On Potential Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This class of somewhat separable GNEPs contains important subclasses such as the linear GNEPs that were studied in [17] or even the NEPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%