2012
DOI: 10.2528/pierb11112106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving for Micro- And Macro-Scale Electrostatic Configurations Using the Robin Hood Algorithm

Abstract: Abstract-We present a novel technique by which highly-segmented electrostatic configurations can be solved. The Robin Hood method is a matrix-inversion algorithm optimized for solving high density boundary element method (BEM) problems.We illustrate the capabilities of this solver by studying two distinct geometry scales: (a) the electrostatic potential of a large volume beta-detector and (b) the field enhancement present at surface of electrode nano-structures. Geometries with elements numbering in the O(10 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Wang et al used matrix pseudoinverse to compute the charge densities per-triangle, this has the drawback of requiring N 2 memory (where N is the number of triangles) to store and invert the matrix. An alternative technique called the Robin-Hood method, which has a space complexity proportional to N [Formaggio et al 2012], is used here instead. This technique randomly assigns charge densities to each triangle of the object surface, then redistributes the charge such that a consistent resulting potential is achieved across probe points on the object surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Wang et al used matrix pseudoinverse to compute the charge densities per-triangle, this has the drawback of requiring N 2 memory (where N is the number of triangles) to store and invert the matrix. An alternative technique called the Robin-Hood method, which has a space complexity proportional to N [Formaggio et al 2012], is used here instead. This technique randomly assigns charge densities to each triangle of the object surface, then redistributes the charge such that a consistent resulting potential is achieved across probe points on the object surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KEMField deals with large systems through the use of either the Robin Hood method, or Krylov subspace methods. The Robin Hood method, which is a special version of the Gauss-Seidel iteration, allows one to solve the linear system with a memory cost proportional to N ( ) and a computational cost which scales like N  a ( ) (with 1 2 a < < ) [27]. On the other hand, Krylov subspace methods such as GMRES [28], if used with straightforward matrix-vector multiplication, would by themselves generally be insufficient to efficiently solve problems of this size.…”
Section: Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electric fields are computed by the boundary element method (BEM) from a set of charge densities at the electrode surfaces. The charge densities are pre-computed from the given electrode potentials with the iterative Robin Hood method [46]. For axially symmetric electric fields, an approximation method known as zonal harmonic expansion can be used to speed up the field computations with negligible loss of accuracy [47].…”
Section: Implementation Into Kassiopeiamentioning
confidence: 99%