2012
DOI: 10.1137/100805200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving Dirichlet Boundary-value Problems on Curved Domains by Extensions from Subdomains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the purely diffusive case, this new approximation of u has been proven to converge with order k + 2 for k ≥ 1 when the domain is polygonal ( [4,6]), and also when it has curved Dirichlet boundary ( [8,9]).…”
Section: Numerical Results: Boundary-value Problemmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the purely diffusive case, this new approximation of u has been proven to converge with order k + 2 for k ≥ 1 when the domain is polygonal ( [4,6]), and also when it has curved Dirichlet boundary ( [8,9]).…”
Section: Numerical Results: Boundary-value Problemmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One of the first ideas in this direction was introduced by [5] for the one-dimensional case and then extended to higher space dimensions for pure diffusion [8,9] and convection-diffusion [9] equations. In their work, the mesh does not fit the domain and the distance between the computational domain and the boundary Γ := ∂Ω is of only order O(h), making this method attractive from a computational point of view.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dG method has been recently proven to successfully support polytopic meshes: we refer the reader, e.g., to [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], as well as to the comprehensive research monograph by Cangiani et al [16]. In addition to the dG method, several other methods are capable to support polytopic meshes, such as the Polygonal Finite Element method [17,18,19,20], the Mimetic Finite Difference method [21,22,23,24], the Virtual Element method [25,26,27,28], the Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin method [29,30,31,32,33], and the Hybrid High-Order method [34,35,36,37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novelty, and strength, of our approach resides on the use of a high order Hybridizable Discontinuous Galerkin (HDG) method combined with a technique for handling geometries with curved boundaries that preserves the order of accuracy of the method. The result is a robust algorithm that is able to provide high order of accuracy for the approximation of both the flux function and the magnetic field, offers good potential for parallel computations [26,27], and provides the flexibility of handling curved geometries (with or without x-points) relying only on polygonal meshes [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%