2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-012-0506-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solving coupled matrix equations over generalized bisymmetric matrices

Abstract: In this paper, an iterative algorithm is established for finding the generalized bisymmetric solution group to the coupled matrix equations (including the generalized (coupled) Lyapunov and Sylvester matrix equations as special cases). It is proved that proposed algorithm consistently converges to the generalized bisymmetric solution group for any initial generalized bisymmetric matrix group. Finally a numerical example indicates that proposed algorithm works quite effectively in practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is seen from this table, the number of iterations of L-GLS is less than that of the NSCG method. Dehghan and Hajarian (2012) and E, J, P, X * and Y * are the corresponding matrices in that example. We applied the L-GLS algorithm and Algorithm 1 of Dehghan and Hajarian (2012) (with a parameter m = 5.1141e25 that is used in Algorithm 1) for solving this example.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As is seen from this table, the number of iterations of L-GLS is less than that of the NSCG method. Dehghan and Hajarian (2012) and E, J, P, X * and Y * are the corresponding matrices in that example. We applied the L-GLS algorithm and Algorithm 1 of Dehghan and Hajarian (2012) (with a parameter m = 5.1141e25 that is used in Algorithm 1) for solving this example.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dehghan and Hajarian (2012) and E, J, P, X * and Y * are the corresponding matrices in that example. We applied the L-GLS algorithm and Algorithm 1 of Dehghan and Hajarian (2012) (with a parameter m = 5.1141e25 that is used in Algorithm 1) for solving this example. Note that we select the best m from Dehghan and Hajarian (2012).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general expressions of the ( R , S ) -symmetric and ( R , S ) -skew symmetric solutions were given in Dehghan and Hajarian (2011b). (Dehghan and Hajarian, 2010, 2012a, 2012b) obtained the solutions, the generalized bisymmetric solutions, the generalized centro-symmetric and central anti-symmetric solutions by extending the CGNE iterative method and GI method. Hajarian (2014) solved general coupled matrix equations by using the matrix form of the CGS method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the convergent rate of the GI method, two variants of the GI method were proposed to solve the Sylvester equations in [30,31]. Meanwhile, the GI method was extended to solve the common solutions, the generalized centro-symmetric solutions, generalized bisymmetric solutions, reflexive and anti-reflexive solutions of some coupled matrix equations, see [32][33][34][35][36] for further details on this topic. However, the optimal convergent factors of these extended GI methods were not given in computing such constraint solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%