1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4168(19980601)21:6<355::aid-jhrc355>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent Trapping during Large Volume Injection with an Early Vapor Exit, Part 1: Description of the Flooding Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the LC-GC injection of a standard solution of n-alkanes under the same conditions as described earlier provided for a recovery of >97% of C 16 hydro-carbon without using a retaining precolumn. This result was in agreement with previous work (Boselli et al, 1998). Thus, short-chain F-acids such as diMeF(7,5) should be efficiently recovered if present in samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, the LC-GC injection of a standard solution of n-alkanes under the same conditions as described earlier provided for a recovery of >97% of C 16 hydro-carbon without using a retaining precolumn. This result was in agreement with previous work (Boselli et al, 1998). Thus, short-chain F-acids such as diMeF(7,5) should be efficiently recovered if present in samples.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This zone is defined as the length of retention gap that is occupied by the solvent film (in cmgL-1). This was firstly reported by Boselli et al [12], who reported flooded zones of about 4 cm 1 gL-for large-volume injections into a 0.53 mm I. D. retention gap [13] which is confirmed by our findings. The occurrence of prepeaks [16] was used to determine the flooded zone.…”
Section: Evaporation Profile For Large-volume Injectionssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…There are several optimisation procedures. In another study where no retaining precolumn was used between the retention gap and the SVE [13] losses were also observed. With a particular set-up of retention gap, retaining precolumn and analytical GC column, the evaporation rate is determined by the pressure used and the length of the individual capillaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the meantime, on-line-coupled LC-GC evolved [11,12]. While the retention gap technique using the on-column interface remained the method of choice for the on-column transfer of fractions containing volatile components [13][14][15], concurrent eluent evaporation for fractions without volatile compounds, such as the wax esters, was increasingly performed also by the on-column interface [12,16]. This enabled to perform the two on-line LC-GC transfer techniques by a single interface and to use the same techniques as for largevolume on-column injection by syringe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%