2017
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201701345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent‐Promoted Regio‐ and Stereoselectivity in Ru‐Catalyzed Hydrocarboxylation of Terminal Alkynes: A DFT Study

Abstract: DFT calculations at the M06L‐D3(SMD)/LANL2TZ(f)/6‐311+G(d,p)//M06L/LANL2DZ/6‐31G(d)* level were performed to explore the mechanism, solvent effect, and origin of selectivity in the hydrocarboxylation of terminal alkynes catalyzed by (PCy3)2(CO)RuHCl. This catalytic system offers a unique example in which selectivity in enol‐ester synthesis is controlled in presence of different solvent media under mild reaction conditions. In CH2Cl2 solvent the regioselective gem‐enol‐ester (Pg) was preferred, whereas stereose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the thermal correction to the Gibbs free energy of each component depends on its concentration in solution, one can incorporate the concentration terms into calculations (details in the SI). Activation barriers of single electron transfer (SET) steps involve in this work have been calculated using Marcus–Hush theory, and are denoted as Δ G ‡ MH (Table S3 in the SI) . Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis were performed using the NBO 6 t.0 package as implemented in Gaussian 09…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the thermal correction to the Gibbs free energy of each component depends on its concentration in solution, one can incorporate the concentration terms into calculations (details in the SI). Activation barriers of single electron transfer (SET) steps involve in this work have been calculated using Marcus–Hush theory, and are denoted as Δ G ‡ MH (Table S3 in the SI) . Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis were performed using the NBO 6 t.0 package as implemented in Gaussian 09…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,16] Forthe hydroalkylation process,protonation of 11 via intermediate 12 generates the E-isomer 13 (concerted protonation demetallation, CPD) along with the formation of Ni I complex 8. [17] Next, the Z-isomer 15 is obtained via intermediate 14 from the E-isomer 13 through an energy-transfer pathway (Scheme 3a). [3c] Likewise,f or arylalkylation, the generated Ni I intermediate 19 undergoes the oxidative addition of an aryl halide to give intermediate 20,f ollowed by reductive elimination to deliver the antiaddition three-component coupling product 21.A tl ast, the syn-addition three-component coupling product 22 is obtained via the energy-transfer pathway (Scheme 3b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction of 9 by the Ir II reductant gives Ni I intermediate 10 , which undergoes 1,2‐migratory alkyne insertion to form Ni I intermediate 11 . For the hydroalkylation process, protonation of 11 via intermediate 12 generates the E ‐isomer 13 (concerted protonation demetallation, CPD) along with the formation of Ni I complex 8 . Next, the Z ‐isomer 15 is obtained via intermediate 14 from the E ‐isomer 13 through an energy‐transfer pathway (Scheme a) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of these reactions, addition of nucleophilic reagents to the central vinylidene carbon generates alkenylmetallic species, which further undergo transformations such as protonation with regeneration of the catalytic species. On the contrary, its reverse reaction, that is, generation of vinylidene complexes from alkenylmetallic species is rather limited even in the stoichiometric reactions, and elimination of α-hydrogen of alkenylmetallic species as hydride for the generation of vinylidene intermediates has not been utilized for catalytic reactions, except for the α-hydrogen elimination proposed for generation of vinylidene complexes from terminal alkynes . In this paper, we report Re­(I)-catalyzed stereoselective hydropropargylation of silyl enol ethers by utilizing dynamic interconversion of vinylidene–alkenylmetal intermediates through reversible 1,5-hydride transfer of α-hydrogen of alkenylrheniums.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%