selection, [13,14] thermal annealing, [15,16] and solvent annealing. [13,17] In recent work, a variety of liquid additives, including 1,8-octanedithiol, [18] 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO), [19,20] nitrobenzene, [21] N-methylpyrrolidone, [22,23] chloronapthalene, [24] etc. have been introduced into the D/A blend. These additives successfully manipulated the nanomorphology of the active layer and markedly increased the efficiency of OSCs. Among these additives, DIO was the most used and also very effective one, power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of over 10% have already been realized with the help of DIO in single-layer OSCs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, optimizing the ratio of additive in the parent solvent is a tedious process, and the additive also deteriorates the reproducibility of the device performance (PCE of the device is very sensitive to DIO ratio variation; the slow drying process of the residual high-boiling-point additive in the active layer could induce undesirable morphological change). [25] What's worse, residual DIO also greatly accelerates the photo-oxidative degradation by acting as a radial initiator and dramatically decreases the lifetime of the device. [26,27] To remove DIO in the film, several methods have been tried such as putting the film in high-vacuum environment, annealing the film at high temperature [26] and washing the film with methanol. [25] However, all these cannot root out the problem that DIO brings in: the high vacuum technique is not amenable to large scale manufacturing process, such as roll-to-roll. The high temperature annealing deteriorates the performance of most high-efficiency OSCs, such as PTB7-Th based ones, [28,29] and may be incompatible with the flexible substrates as well, such as poly(ethylene terephthalate). [30] Thereby, materials that can be processed with simple and reliable procedures which do not require additive addition and active layer post treatments (thermal annealing, solvent annealing, and surface modification) are urgently required. In this regard, several donor and acceptor materials have been tried. For example, Lin et al. employed a new acceptor ITIC-Th in fullerene-free solar cells and got a PCE of 7.5%, [31] Yue et al. designed a novel polymer donor TBTIT-h in OSCs and gained a PCE of 9.1%, [32] Zhang et al. applied a new polymer PBDT-TS1 in OSCs and realized a PCE of 9.67%. [33] In this paper, we utilized a D-A copolymer PThBDTP (consisting of a thiophene as the donor and BDTP as the acceptor unit), [34] and achieved a PCE of 10.06% based on the PThBDTP:PC 71 BM blend. As far as we know, such efficiency is the highest for those additive-free and post treatment free OSCs. Nowadays, solvent additives are widely used in organic solar cells (OSCs) to tune the nano-morphology of the active blend film and enhance the device performance. With their help, power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of OSCs have recently stepped over 10%. However, residual additive in the device can induce undesirable morphological change and also accelerate photo-oxidation de...