2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2019.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvent effects on the absorption and fluorescence spectra of Zaleplon: Determination of ground and excited state dipole moments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the substituents changing from a donating group 2a ( t -Bu), 2b (OMe) to a withdrawing group 2c (CHO), the absorption peaks are bathochromically shifted from 317 to 334 nm. In contrast, the compound 2d (CF 3 ) with six of the strongest acceptor −CF 3 groups is blue-shifted ∼3 nm compared with that of 2a , probably due to the effect of the dipole moment. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the substituents changing from a donating group 2a ( t -Bu), 2b (OMe) to a withdrawing group 2c (CHO), the absorption peaks are bathochromically shifted from 317 to 334 nm. In contrast, the compound 2d (CF 3 ) with six of the strongest acceptor −CF 3 groups is blue-shifted ∼3 nm compared with that of 2a , probably due to the effect of the dipole moment. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, the compound 2d (CF 3 ) with six of the strongest acceptor −CF 3 groups is blueshifted ∼3 nm compared with that of 2a, probably due to the effect of the dipole moment. 31,32 Upon excitation, all compounds emitted deep blue fluorescence both in solution and in the solid state. As shown in Figure 2B, the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of compound 2 illustrated a structureless emission band in the range of 438− 458 nm in CH 2 Cl 2 solution with the order 2d < 2a < 2b < 2c, due to the electronic effect of the terminal group.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models (including the Lippert-Mataga one) are so crude that often experimental data can be fit equally well to any one of them. [565][566][567][568][569][570][571] More important is the basic molecular physics that underlies this approach. Comparison to the model of a dipole in a spherical cavity [Equation (2.18)] shows that the physical content of Equation (5.4) is to take the difference dipole moment Δμ and solvate it using permittivity ε ∞ rather than ε s .…”
Section: Conceptual Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a variety of alternative formulas for this purpose have been suggested, 556–564 along the lines of Equation () but differing somewhat in their treatment of excited‐state polarization, which leads to differences in the form of the “solvent polarity function” F ( ε s , ε ∞ ). These models (including the Lippert‐Mataga one) are so crude that often experimental data can be fit equally well to any one of them 565–571 . More important is the basic molecular physics that underlies this approach.…”
Section: Nonequilibrium Solvationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models (including the Lippert-Mataga one) are so crude that often experimental data can be fit equally well to any one of them. [411][412][413][414][415][416][417] More important is the basic molecular physics that underlies this approach.…”
Section: Conceptual Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%