The time-dependent fluorescence frequency shift of protein-attached probes has a much slower decay than that for the free probe. The decay times, ranging from 10 ps to several nanoseconds, have been attributed to hydration water motions several orders of magnitude slower than those in the hydration shell of small solutes. This interpretation deviates strongly from the prevailing picture of protein hydration dynamics. We argue here that the slow decay in the fluorescence shift can be explained by a ubiquitous solvent polarization mechanism, with no need to invoke slow water motions or a dynamic coupling with protein motions. This mechanism can be qualitatively understood with the aid of a dielectric continuum model. We therefore conclude that the long decay times measured with time-dependent fluorescence spectroscopy contain no information about protein hydration dynamics.Many biological processes depend critically on the dynamical properties of the water-protein interface. During the past half century, a diverse array of techniques has therefore been recruited to the challenging task of quantitatively characterizing, under physiological solution conditions, the motions of water molecules in the protein hydration layer.1 The current picture, founded largely on 17 O NMR relaxation 2-5 and MD simulation [6][7][8][9][10][11] studies, reveals a dynamically heterogeneous hydration layer; a few water molecules spend long periods (up to ∼1 ns) trapped in surface pockets, while ∼90% of the interfacial water molecules, like those in the hydration shell of small organic solutes, suffer a mere two-fold average dynamical retardation as compared to bulk water. In recent years, this picture has been challenged by time-resolved fluorescence measurements, which seem to indicate that water motions in the hydration layer are slowed down by several orders of magnitude. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] In this Letter, we argue that the long decay times seen by this technique reflect protein conformational fluctuations rather than hydration dynamics. There is thus no need to revise the prevailing picture of protein hydration dynamics.The fluorescence-detected dynamic Stokes shift (DSS) monitors the interaction energy of a fluorescent probe with its molecular environment. The charge distribution of the probe is altered by electronic excitation, and the ensuing readjustment of the environment is reflected in the time-dependent DSS. The DSS from a free probe in aqueous solution exhibits a sub-100 fs inertial decay of large amplitude, followed by a diffusive decay with a characteristic time of ∼1 ps. 23,24 In a dielectric model, the longer decay time corresponds to the dipolar longitudinal relaxation time of the solvent, which is 0.6 ps for bulk water at 298 K.When the probe is attached to a protein, the DSS exhibits one or more slowly decaying components in addition to the inertial decay (which is not always resolved) and a fast diffusive decay of a few picoseconds (corresponding to the ∼1 ps component of the free probe). Th...