1980
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1980-0127.ch002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvation: A Molecular Dynamics Study of a Dipeptide in Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results demonstrate an increased short-time mobility of waters near the hydrophobic patches, rooted in nondiffusive motion. Other authors have reported an effect of hydrophobicity on the diffusive motion relative to polar residues, but there is disagreement on whether hydrophobic surfaces increase (Levitt and Sharon, 1988) or decrease (Karplus and Rossky, 1980;Brooks and Karplus, 1989) the diffusion coefficient. Clearly, the disagreement between the computational studies suggests that the simulation of the physical properties of water at a protein surface are modeldependent because of limitations of the various protein and water force fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our results demonstrate an increased short-time mobility of waters near the hydrophobic patches, rooted in nondiffusive motion. Other authors have reported an effect of hydrophobicity on the diffusive motion relative to polar residues, but there is disagreement on whether hydrophobic surfaces increase (Levitt and Sharon, 1988) or decrease (Karplus and Rossky, 1980;Brooks and Karplus, 1989) the diffusion coefficient. Clearly, the disagreement between the computational studies suggests that the simulation of the physical properties of water at a protein surface are modeldependent because of limitations of the various protein and water force fields.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The statistically preferred orientation of /, water molecules adjacent to anionic kosmotropes is with the water hydrogen atom approximately on a straight line between the anionic kosmotrope and the water oxygen (133, 402); the statistically preferred orientation of /, water molecules adjacent to cationic kosmotropes, although not known with certainty, is probably with a water oxygen unshared electron pair approximately on a straight line between the cationic kosmotrope and the water oxygen (133, 229,828). The statistically preferred orientation of /; water molecules adjacent to non-polar kosmotropes is with 1 hydrogen bond or unshared electron pair approximately perpendicular to and pointing away from the surface of the solute (402,(463)(464)746). The double-headed arrow indicates maximization of hydrogen-bonding interactions approximately parallel to the surface of the test solute; this surface may be curved, as in clathrate structures (170,171,289,445,842).…”
Section: A Molecular Model For the Structure Of Water At Interfacmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The angle dependent H-bond interaction determines about § of the intermolecular energy of u -6 kcal/mol in ice (480,565), and we shall present a qualitative picture of the behaviour of liquid water primarily in terms of hydrogen-bonding interactions. We assume that each of the water molecules in the first surface layer at the air-water interface makes slightly fewer hydrogen bonds with its neighbours than the 3-45 typical for bulk water at 30 °C (463)(464)746). We suggest that the rapidly rotating water molecules in the first surface layer will show a slight preference for orientations in which they are net hydrogen bond donors (Lewis acid (450) centres) to the bulk solution.…”
Section: A Molecular Mechanism For the Origins Of H O F M E I S mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(There are, however, faster low‐resolution models that achieve good results9). Other approaches try to identify flexible hinge joints or rigid domains directly from a single conformation of the molecule 10–14. Very recently, an ingenious and elegant approach was developed for estimating the flexibility of proteins using graph theory 14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%