2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp23305c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solvated electrons at the water–air interface: surface versus bulk signal in low kinetic energy photoelectron spectroscopy

Abstract: Time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy at low kinetic energies (≲5 eV) is applied to dilute iodide solutions with different surface and bulk contributions. The results indicate a pronounced surface sensitivity. Signals assigned to solvated electrons near the liquid surface decay rapidly on a sub-ps timescale. In contrast to the literature, a long-lived surface solvated electron at 1.6 eV binding energy is not observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
104
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This view is consistent with the fact that negative ζ-potentials of colloidal drops and bubbles in the static electric fields of electrophoretic experiments require the presence of negatively charged discrete entities that can migrate independently of their counterions, such as OH − , rather than of inward-pointing water dipoles or chargetransfer [H 2 O − ···H 2 O + ] moieties (55)(56)(57)(58). A potential role for hydrated electrons, H 2 O·e − , as discrete carriers can be discarded because their formation via 3 H 2 O = H 2 O·e − + H 3 O + + ·OH, is thermodynamically forbidden under ambient conditions (56,59,60).…”
Section: Quantum-mechanical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is consistent with the fact that negative ζ-potentials of colloidal drops and bubbles in the static electric fields of electrophoretic experiments require the presence of negatively charged discrete entities that can migrate independently of their counterions, such as OH − , rather than of inward-pointing water dipoles or chargetransfer [H 2 O − ···H 2 O + ] moieties (55)(56)(57)(58). A potential role for hydrated electrons, H 2 O·e − , as discrete carriers can be discarded because their formation via 3 H 2 O = H 2 O·e − + H 3 O + + ·OH, is thermodynamically forbidden under ambient conditions (56,59,60).…”
Section: Quantum-mechanical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VDEs and the first three excitation energies for e − (H 2 O) 4 and e − (H 2 O) 6 clusters embedded in a polarizable continuum model of the solvent in geometries depicted in Fig. 1 6 , respectively, which is close to the experimentally determined VDEs from different photoelectron spectroscopy studies on liquid microjet ranging from 3.3 to 3.6 eV [14][15][16][17]. The optical spectrum of the hydrated electron is constituted by three s → p-like transitions lying around 1.7 eV and a slowly decaying blue tail [41].…”
Section: Embedded Cluster Models For E − Aqmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Only in the last few years, photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) in aqueous microjets allowed to determine the vertical binding energy of an electron solvated in bulk liquid water, amounting to 3.3-3.6 eV [14][15][16][17]. Calculations showed, that the most strongly bound isomers in large cryogenic clusters bear some resemblance to the ambient bulk hydrated electron, while the more weakly bound cluster isomers do not have an analogue in the liquid [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly though, a significant fraction of the CTTS-state manifold, with energies fairly near the CTTS lowest state, is populated instantaneously by one-photon absorption. Relaxation of the CTTS states occurs within 100 -500 fs [13,15,12]. The observed spread in time constants is associated with aforementioned structure diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case no solute intramolecular effects need to be accounted for. Although resonant excitation is indeed a crucial factor in previous experimental studies of the CTTS dynamics, the resonance condition is rather loosely defined since photon energies vary considerably in different experiments, typically between 5.1 and 6.2 eV [13,14,15,16]. Importantly though, a significant fraction of the CTTS-state manifold, with energies fairly near the CTTS lowest state, is populated instantaneously by one-photon absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%