2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solutions to arithmetic differential equations in algebraically closed fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollaries 5.14, 3.9 and Proposition 3.13). This can be viewed as a simultaneous generalization of the main results in [Bu95] and [BM20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Corollaries 5.14, 3.9 and Proposition 3.13). This can be viewed as a simultaneous generalization of the main results in [Bu95] and [BM20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The homomorphisms ψ alg are not given by algebraic (or even by analytic) functions in the coordinates but rather by analytic (in fact rigid analytic) functions in the coordinates and their various "δ π ′ -derivatives" for various π ′ 's dividing π. The recipe for defining these maps involves the notion of total δ-overconvergence which is analogous to the one in [BM20] and will be explained in the body of the paper. Note that since E is projective over R π we have E(K alg ) = E(R alg ); however, it is an important feature of the theory that the images of the maps ψ alg are not contained in R alg .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations