2016
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.20976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solutions of plasmonic structures using the multilevel fast multipole algorithm

Abstract: We consider accurate full‐wave solutions of plasmonic problems using the multilevel fast multipole algorithm (MLFMA). Metallic structures at optical frequencies are modeled by using the Lorentz‐Drude model, formulated with surface integral equations, and analyzed iteratively via MLFMA. Among alternative choices, the electric and magnetic current combined‐field integral equation (JMCFIE) and the combined tangential formulation (CTF), which are popular integral‐equation formulations for penetrable objects, are d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using pools of 40 individuals, each optimization was carried out for a maximum of 200 generations, leading to total of 8000 2 16, 000   simulations by MLFMA or its approximate form. The MLFMA solver was particularly designed for effi cient analysis of plasmonic structures [12]. The main formulation was selected as the modifi ed combined tangential formulation (MCTF) that provided both accurate and effi cient solutions of homogeneous plasmonic objects [13].…”
Section: Short Description Of the Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using pools of 40 individuals, each optimization was carried out for a maximum of 200 generations, leading to total of 8000 2 16, 000   simulations by MLFMA or its approximate form. The MLFMA solver was particularly designed for effi cient analysis of plasmonic structures [12]. The main formulation was selected as the modifi ed combined tangential formulation (MCTF) that provided both accurate and effi cient solutions of homogeneous plasmonic objects [13].…”
Section: Short Description Of the Numerical Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given accuracy, interactions at long distances can be omitted since the inner and outer interactions are combined in the surface formulations and outer interactions (related to the free space) dominate the related matrix elements [30]. The threshold distance for this purpose can also be found by considering the exponential behavior of the decay for large imaginary values of the wavenumber.…”
Section: Matrix-vector Multiplications With Mlfmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, there is a great flexibility in geometric modeling, allowing sharp edges and corners, tips, and subwavelength details [29]. On top of these, the background of surface integral equations provides self-consistency and accuracy-check mechanisms, such as based on the equivalence theorem, enabling accuracy analysis without resorting to alternative solvers [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since MCTF involves the combinations of interactions from the inner and outer media, the contributions from the inner medium become very small for some longdistance interactions. This allows us to omit such contributions without deteriorating the accuracy [38]. As an example, consider the first term for Z MCTF 11 in Eq.…”
Section: Accelerated Matrix-vector Multiplications With Mlfmamentioning
confidence: 99%