2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-008-0215-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solutions of elliptic problems with nonlinearities of linear growth

Abstract: In this paper, we study existence of nontrivial solutions to the elliptic equationNontrivial solutions are obtained in the case in which the nonlinearities have linear growth. That is, for some c > 0, | f (x, u)| ≤ c|u| for x ∈ and u ∈ R, and −cI m ≤ ∇ 2 u V (x, u) ≤ cI m for x ∈ and u ∈ R m , where I m is the m × m identity matrix. In sharp contrast to the existing results in the literature, we do not make any assumptions at infinity on the asymptotic behaviors of the nonlinearity f and ∇ u V . Mathematics Su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spirit the idea was already used in [1,6,28] in the setting of asymptotically linear problems, though technically our constructions of modifications are different from those in [1,6,28]. Our approach follows closely to that in [23] for nonlinear elliptic problems. Due to the strongly indefinite nature of Hamiltonian systems, we need to overcome some more involved issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In spirit the idea was already used in [1,6,28] in the setting of asymptotically linear problems, though technically our constructions of modifications are different from those in [1,6,28]. Our approach follows closely to that in [23] for nonlinear elliptic problems. Due to the strongly indefinite nature of Hamiltonian systems, we need to overcome some more involved issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…for all x ∈ X, with z ≥ K. The proof is the same as that of Lemma 3.4 in [19]. The only difference is that in [19,Lemma 3.4], it deals with the finite dimensional case, but here we deal with the infinite dimensional case.…”
Section: Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The only difference is that in [19,Lemma 3.4], it deals with the finite dimensional case, but here we deal with the infinite dimensional case. Since where involved only formal computations, all the estimates are still valid, the proof carries over verbatim.…”
Section: Proofs Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to prove Theorem 1.4, inspired by [19] and [20], consider a sequence of modified problems −(Jż + L(t)z) = H m (t, z).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 14mentioning
confidence: 99%