1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00276875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solutions in Lr of the Navier-Stokes initial value problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
255
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
255
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[12], [14]) that ∇h ∈ H ⊥ σ , from which (2.1) immediately follows. One can also deduce this directly by noting the identity v · ∇h = div(hv) − (div v)h = div(hv) and then using Green's Theorem.…”
Section: Preliminary Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12], [14]) that ∇h ∈ H ⊥ σ , from which (2.1) immediately follows. One can also deduce this directly by noting the identity v · ∇h = div(hv) − (div v)h = div(hv) and then using Green's Theorem.…”
Section: Preliminary Observations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…When n = 3 it is well known that the situation is quite different; the existence and uniqueness of global strong solutions remains an open question for arbitrary initial data. Indeed, for many years global existence was known only for small initial data in the domain of (−∆) 1/4 [12]; this result was generalized to allow small initial data in L 3 (Ω) in [14]. Recently, it was discovered that large initial data could be allowed if the domain Ω is "thin" enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a smooth bounded domain in R n , it was proved by Y. Giga and T. Miyakawa in [22] that the Dirichlet-Navier-Stokes system admits a local mild solution for initial values in L n (critical space for the system in dimension n). Their method relies on the fact that the Dirichlet-Stokes operator, as defined in Section 1, extends to all L p spaces and is the negative generator of an analytic semigroup there, which was proved in [21].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniqueness proof is done in a standard way, so it is omitted. To see that the solution ( u, w ) of (30) [7], Giga & Miyakawa [9], Kozono & Ogawa [13], we can show the Hölder continuity with respect to time for the nonlinear term in L 3 σ (Ω) × L α (Ω) and this allows us to show that ( u, w ) is, in fact, a strong solution for the system (29) in the sense given in Definition 2.3 (see Tanabe [29]), Theorem 3.3.4).…”
Section: Remark 53mentioning
confidence: 99%