“…The existence of the limits (41) and (42) follows from (34) in Theorem 9 and the above background Result 4 [11] since, for each ∈ for any ∈ , there is a finite = ( ) ∈ Z 0+ such that lim inf → ∞ + ( ) ∈ +1 with = sup ∈ ( ), ∀ ∈ so that the limits (41) exist (note that = 1, ∀ ∈ if : ⋃ ∈ → ⋃ ∈ is acyclic impulsive self-mapping). The limit (42) exists from the background Results 1 and 5 of [11] with ∈ and +1 = ( ) ∈ +1 , ∀ ∈ being unique best proximity points of : ⋃ ∈ → ⋃ ∈ in and +1 ; ∀ ∈ since ( , ) is also a ( , ‖‖) uniformly convex Banach space for the norm-induced metric and the subsets of , ∀ ∈ are nonempty, closed and convex. The limiting set ( , (1)…”