1999
DOI: 10.1109/7.745706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution to a multisensor tracking problem with sensor registration errors

Abstract: A direct solution to GPS-type navigation equations. An alternative closed-form solution to the GPS pseudo-range equations.An on-line solution to the aircraft tracking problem with a distributed network of 3D sensors that are imperfectly registered is presented. Errors in the relative positions and orientations of the sensors are modeled and estimated by an extended Kalman filter [EKF], along with the track variables. This optimal solution, tractable for a limited number of targets, is compared through Monte-Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be accomplished by extrapolation of pairs of measurements to a common time reference and posterior differentiation (see, for instance, [2,6]), by the procedure described in this paper or by other techniques (e.g. such as definition of pseudo measures from combinations of measures [4,5,10] or parallel target state and bias estimation [3,7,9]). In general, independently of the method applied, an observation of the bias terms is obtained from each measure or group of measures coming from the involved sensors.…”
Section: Bias Estimation and Correction Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be accomplished by extrapolation of pairs of measurements to a common time reference and posterior differentiation (see, for instance, [2,6]), by the procedure described in this paper or by other techniques (e.g. such as definition of pseudo measures from combinations of measures [4,5,10] or parallel target state and bias estimation [3,7,9]). In general, independently of the method applied, an observation of the bias terms is obtained from each measure or group of measures coming from the involved sensors.…”
Section: Bias Estimation and Correction Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]). The basic idea is estimating every bias terms in the measurements potentially causing consistency mismatch, and removing them from raw measures, providing the tracking filters with bias-corrected (mostly unbiased) measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional on-line refinement must be carried out with the fusion data while the coalition is active, to remove residual systematic errors of slow time variation among the sources of information, and guarantee the stability of fusion. This process of dynamic multi-sensor alignment is an important component for sensor fusion is referred in sensor fusion literature to as multi-sensor registration [35][36][37][38][39]. As mentioned above, on-line solutions are needed to estimate on-line the potentially timevariant systematic errors in parallel with tracking, using the same available data.…”
Section: Multi-camera Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in a multi-radar multi-target system, each radar range and azimuth bias can cause significant errors in the target location. Therefore, many sensor registration algorithms have been proposed in the literature, such as the least squares (LS) method [2] and the maximum likelihood estimator method [3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%