2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.909293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution Structures in Non-ordered Discrete Screening Problems: Trees, Stars and Cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, n}. The buyers are assumed to be friendly (Nahata et al 2004), i.e., they choose the most profitable bundle for the firm when they are indifferent between two or more bundles. The firm's problem can now be formulated as…”
Section: Nonlinear Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…, n}. The buyers are assumed to be friendly (Nahata et al 2004), i.e., they choose the most profitable bundle for the firm when they are indifferent between two or more bundles. The firm's problem can now be formulated as…”
Section: Nonlinear Pricing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second assumption is that there is only one quality dimension and the single-crossing assumption is satisfied. With more buyer types and multiple dimensions, there are more possible solution structures and finding the optimal structure is more complicated Ehtamo 2008, 2009;Nahata et al 2004).…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations