2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution structure of an 11-mer duplex containing the 3,N4-ethenocytosine adduct opposite 2′-deoxycytidine: implications for the recognition of exocyclic lesions by DNA glycosylases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the base pairing preferences are similar for both the 8-HM-εC and εC-containing oligonucleotides. The latter compound is closely related structurally to 8-HM-εC and it has been established that it is a mutagenic lesion (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Moreover, by molecular modeling, we showed that little difference exists in the planarity and sugar conformations of the two derivatives in duplex DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, the base pairing preferences are similar for both the 8-HM-εC and εC-containing oligonucleotides. The latter compound is closely related structurally to 8-HM-εC and it has been established that it is a mutagenic lesion (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). Moreover, by molecular modeling, we showed that little difference exists in the planarity and sugar conformations of the two derivatives in duplex DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Moreover, the specific interaction of both the MUG and ANPG proteins with 1,N 2 -⑀G when present in DNA suggests that these enzymes are similar with respect to the conformation of their active site pockets. This hypothesis is supported by the computer modeling of ⑀C in the active site of ANPG, which reveals a good fit of the ⑀-base into the active site of the enzyme despite its lack of activity (53). Surprisingly, neither hTDG (the human structural homologue of MUG) nor AlkA (the E. coli functional homologue of ANPG) excises or specifically binds 1,N 2 -⑀G when present in DNA (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Specific binding of ANPG to ⑀C⅐G suggests that the enzyme recognizes ⑀C in the active site pocket; however, in contrast to MUG and hTDG, is not able to excise the adduct. Cullinan et al (53,54) have shown by computer modeling that the ⑀C nucleoside fits neatly into the active site of ANPG. However, these authors proposed that ANPG is not able to extrude the ⑀C residue from duplex DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%