Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1995
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/11/4/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of the basic equation of stellar statistics

Abstract: The basic equation of stellar statistics connects the probability density function of a measurable quantity with the probability density of two variables, which cannot be observed directly, by the Bayes theorem of conditional probabilities. The resulting relation is a Fredholm-type integral equation of the first kind. If the two background variables are statistically independent we recover the convolution equation. The analytical solution based on the Fourier transformation is very sensitive to high-frequency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the functions in these equations have a stochastic rather than analytical interpretation, it is to be expected that statistical inversion algorithms will be more robust. This is confirmed by several authors, for instance Turchin, Kozlov & Malkevich (1971), Jupp & Vozoff (1975), Balázs (1995).…”
Section: Inversion Of the Stellar Statistics Equationsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the functions in these equations have a stochastic rather than analytical interpretation, it is to be expected that statistical inversion algorithms will be more robust. This is confirmed by several authors, for instance Turchin, Kozlov & Malkevich (1971), Jupp & Vozoff (1975), Balázs (1995).…”
Section: Inversion Of the Stellar Statistics Equationsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The inversion of integral equations such as is ill‐conditioned. Typical analytical methods for solving these equations (see Balázs 1995) cannot achieve a good solution because of the sensitivity of the kernel to the noise of the counts (see, for instance, Craig & Brown 1986, chapter 5).…”
Section: Inversion Of the Stellar Statistics Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical analytical methods for solving these equations (see Balázs 1995) cannot achieve a good solution because of the sensitivity of the kernel to the noise of the star counts (see, e.g., Craig & Brown 1986, chapter 5). Since the functions in these equations have a stochastic rather than analytical interpretation, it is to be expected that statistical-inversion algorithms will be more robust (Turchin et al 1971;Jupp & Vozoff 1975;Balázs 1995). Among these statistical methods, the iterative method of Lucy's algorithm (Lucy 1974;Turchin et al 1971;Balázs 1995;López-Corredoira et al 2000) is an appropriate one.…”
Section: Appendix A: Lucy's Methods For the Inversion Of Fredholm Intementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical analytical methods for solving these equations (Balázs 1995) cannot achieve a good solution because the kernel is sensitive to the noise of the star counts (Craig & Brown 1986, chapter 5). Because the functions in these equations have a stochastic rather than analytical interpretation, it is to be expected that statistical inversion algorithms are more robust (Turchin et al 1971;Vozoff & Jupp 1975;Balázs 1995). These statistical methods include the iterative method of Lucy's algorithm (Lucy 1974;Turchin et al 1971;Balázs 1995;López-Corredoira et al 2000), which is appropriate here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the functions in these equations have a stochastic rather than analytical interpretation, it is to be expected that statistical inversion algorithms are more robust (Turchin et al 1971;Vozoff & Jupp 1975;Balázs 1995). These statistical methods include the iterative method of Lucy's algorithm (Lucy 1974;Turchin et al 1971;Balázs 1995;López-Corredoira et al 2000), which is appropriate here. Its key feature is the interpretation of the kernel as a conditioned probability and the application of Bayes' theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%