1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.40.12255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of Schrödinger’s equation for large systems

Abstract: Iterative diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix is required to solve very large electronicstructure problems. Present algorithms are limited in their convergence rates at low wave numbers by stability problems associated with large changes in the Hartree potential, and at high wave numbers with large changes in the kinetic energy. A new method is described which includes the e6'ect of density changes on the potentials and properly scales the changes in kinetic energy. The use of this method has increased t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
473
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,015 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
473
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peaks at 1877 and 1853 cm-' (indicating bridging CO) decreased in intensity faster than the peak at 2059 cm-l (indicating terminal CO). These results suggest that the bridging CO ligands are more labile than the terminal ligands and are consistent with the work of Handy et al 9 However, in Handy's work, both the terminal and bridging bands shifted to lower energy as the degree of decarbonylation increased; such a result was not observed in this work. The reasons for the difference may be related to the difference in the decarbonylation environment; our sample was evacuated, but Handy's was treated in H e and presumably contained residual CO, which may have readsorbed on the metal, with the amount decreasing with increasing temperature.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface and Extracted Species Bysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The peaks at 1877 and 1853 cm-' (indicating bridging CO) decreased in intensity faster than the peak at 2059 cm-l (indicating terminal CO). These results suggest that the bridging CO ligands are more labile than the terminal ligands and are consistent with the work of Handy et al 9 However, in Handy's work, both the terminal and bridging bands shifted to lower energy as the degree of decarbonylation increased; such a result was not observed in this work. The reasons for the difference may be related to the difference in the decarbonylation environment; our sample was evacuated, but Handy's was treated in H e and presumably contained residual CO, which may have readsorbed on the metal, with the amount decreasing with increasing temperature.…”
Section: Characterization Of Surface and Extracted Species Bysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To theoretically simulate the defect dynamics in the tails and middle of the gap, we began with a 216 atom model of a-Se by Zhang and Drabold 23 and relaxed it to its local minimum using conjugate gradient algorithm 24,25 as implemented by the Vienna Ab-Initio Software Package, VASP. 26,27 The relaxed model is quite realistic and appears to correctly reproduce structural, electronic and vibrational properties of a-Se.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimization of the functional uses gradient vectors and corresponding conjugate components. Our parallel algorithm for the electronic degrees of freedom is based on the band-by-band serial algorithm proposed by Teter, Payne, and Allan [20], modified to facilitate the treatment of large unit cells and metallic systems. The PPMD (Petascale Pseudopotential Molecular Dynamics) code allows the optimization of electronic and structural properties at zero and finite temperatures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, like BG/L, they tend to have many nodes with relatively small memory per node. In addition, even with an appropriate machine, this approach can exhibit stability problems, requiring great care in SCF mixing to attain convergence [20,21]. The approach used in PPMD is based on the band-by-band algorithm of Ref.…”
Section: A General Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation