2021
DOI: 10.1002/int.22542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solution of matrix games with rough interval pay‐offs and its application in the telecom market share problem

Abstract: Rough interval (RI) is an appropriate generalization of the crisp interval and is very much useful to express uncertain parameters or partially unknown variables when they contain dual-layer information. In real-life problems, there are many situations where players of a matrix game cannot assess their pay-offs by using fuzzy sets/intuitionistic fuzzy sets or ordinary intervals. RIs are used as an excellent tool to handle such situations. This paper explores matrix games with RI pay-offs and investigates two d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the method proposed in this paper cannot handle multi-attribute decision making in complex q-rung linguistic fuzzy environments or complex q-rung fuzzy N-soft environments, in future work, we will extend Frank aggregation operators under complex q-rung linguistic orthopair fuzzy environments, complex q-rung fuzzy N-soft environments and T‐spherical fuzzy environments, or develop Frank aggregation operators to 3, 4-quasirung fuzzy sets (Seikh and Mandal, 2022 ). In addition, we shall further generalize these defined operators to deal with Biogas plant implementation problem (Karmakar et al 2021 ), plastic ban problem (Seikh et al 2021a ), market share problem (Seikh et al 2021b ), social network analysis (Liu et al 2022a ), social trust propagation mechanism (Liu et al 2022b ) and incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations (Wang et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2020a , 2020b , 2020c ), or extend the aggregation operators to other domains, such as pattern recognition, cluster analysis and investment decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the method proposed in this paper cannot handle multi-attribute decision making in complex q-rung linguistic fuzzy environments or complex q-rung fuzzy N-soft environments, in future work, we will extend Frank aggregation operators under complex q-rung linguistic orthopair fuzzy environments, complex q-rung fuzzy N-soft environments and T‐spherical fuzzy environments, or develop Frank aggregation operators to 3, 4-quasirung fuzzy sets (Seikh and Mandal, 2022 ). In addition, we shall further generalize these defined operators to deal with Biogas plant implementation problem (Karmakar et al 2021 ), plastic ban problem (Seikh et al 2021a ), market share problem (Seikh et al 2021b ), social network analysis (Liu et al 2022a ), social trust propagation mechanism (Liu et al 2022b ) and incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations (Wang et al 2021 ; Liu et al 2020a , 2020b , 2020c ), or extend the aggregation operators to other domains, such as pattern recognition, cluster analysis and investment decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research should be conducted to determine the relationship between variables. Therefore, it is proposed that further studies should be done, focusing more on MCDM and new tools and approaches such as intuitionistic fuzzy set [96], type-2 fuzzy variable [97], and Rough interval [98], considering the challenges and control strategies for reaching a consensus via a group decision-making process [99,100]. In conclusion, the findings of this study can improve the status of health and environmental indicators and help achieve sustainable development goals in surface mines by identifying and prioritizing factors influencing DE and recommending practical solutions to eliminate and control such errors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, any optimal strategies ε * of the projectile in the game must abandon the pure strategy. That is, if it is known that one optimal strategy ε * of the projectile satisfies ε * > 0, it must be the case that E(λ k , ε * ) = v. If it is determined that the sum of the optimal strategies of the projectile and the aircraft target is greater than zero, there is an inequality group, which can be expressed by Formulas ( 15) and ( 16) [39][40][41].…”
Section: Calculation Of the Nash Equilibrium Solution Of The Damage G...mentioning
confidence: 99%