Solution of an inverse convection problem by a predictor–corrector approach

Solution of the inverse jet in a crossflow problem by a predictor–corrector technique

“…Error in the prediction of xS from several sampled cases within the jet with source elevation known (min:1.89%, max:4.53%, median:3.24%) [16]. Table 8 Error in predicting source axial location (xS), source strength (US and TS) from a few sample cases within the jet, search shape with 9 pts, utilizing experimental data [16]. Unfortunately, the error sensitive nature of the methodology when solving for the source temperature the errors are much higher than desirable.…”

“…The basis for the solution strategy was described in the paper by VanderVeer and Jaluria [9], which was intended to solve the inverse plume in a crosswind. This methodology solved for the 2-D location and source strength of a plume in a crossflow.…”

“…(15) in which we can find a predicted temperature from Eq. (16). We can develop an equation similar to Eq.…”

“…The problem entails solving for the plume boundary conditions, utilizing limited domain knowledge. A novel predictor-corrector method was developed by VanderVeer and Jaluria [9] to solve such a problem. The method requires a specific pattern of known points to match exactly against a set of simulations to predict the inverse solution.…”

“…Error in the prediction of US from several sampled cases within the jet with rS known (min:0.08%, max:1.32%, median:0.33%)[16].…”