1975
DOI: 10.1039/f19757100001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solute diffusion in hydrated polymer networks. Part 1.—Cellulose gels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increased hydrodynamic friction has been said to have a dominant role in the hindered diffusion of solutes in gels 86,88 . Finally, interactions between the solvent and polymer matrix increase the local viscosity of the solvent; this is also known as “solvent structuring.” 89 Tanigushi and Horigome state that the water in the vicinity of the polymer (bound water) can be structured around the polymer and therefore be unable to contribute to the transport of solutes, while the bulk water is highly mobile and can solvate the solutes 90 . But investigating the causes of hindered diffusion in gels is difficult using macroscopic diffusion measurements since the various factors which affect diffusion cannot be directly isolated.…”
Section: Diffusion In Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increased hydrodynamic friction has been said to have a dominant role in the hindered diffusion of solutes in gels 86,88 . Finally, interactions between the solvent and polymer matrix increase the local viscosity of the solvent; this is also known as “solvent structuring.” 89 Tanigushi and Horigome state that the water in the vicinity of the polymer (bound water) can be structured around the polymer and therefore be unable to contribute to the transport of solutes, while the bulk water is highly mobile and can solvate the solutes 90 . But investigating the causes of hindered diffusion in gels is difficult using macroscopic diffusion measurements since the various factors which affect diffusion cannot be directly isolated.…”
Section: Diffusion In Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Kou and Amidon attribute a low phenylpropanolamine diffusivity in swollen poly(HEMA‐co‐MA) gels to an interaction between the solute and the network 107 . Similarly, Brown and Chitumbo claim the low diffusivity of ethylene glycol and crown [15–5] ether in cellulose gels is due to weak interactive forces between the solute and the gel matrix 89 . Leloup and Colonna attribute the same behavior for bovine serum albumin in amylose gels to hydrodynamic friction between the solute and matrix 108 .…”
Section: Diffusion In Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For molecules of similar size and excluded volume, one would expect an identical decrease in diffusion coefficient. Thus, in vitro, in a hydrated neutral cellulose gel, Brown and Chitumbo (1975a) found that, for both small molecules and microions, the network perturbation of the diffusion process could be represented by a single common factor, reducing diffusion coefficients in common fashion for both uncharged and charged species; for larger molecules, the excluded volume effect was, of course, larger. In the absence of charge on the gel, no differential effect on small neutral and small charged molecules was found.…”
Section: Bulk Polyelectrolyte Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose the range t recirculationloop .t equilibriium , where t equilibrium is the time necessary to reach equilibrium and t recirculationloop defined as the ratio of the volume of the recirculation loop V loop to the recirculation flow rate Q recirculationloop . It should be stressed that the peak obtained for short times has been already reported (Brown and Chitumbo, 1975), but it has never been quantitatively taken into account. 4.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 90%
“…This work intends to explore and analyze the influence of a surprisingly rarely reported effect in the batch diffusion cell method, linked to the use of a small volume recirculation loop. In fact, this type of device is often implemented in order to ensure solute concentration analysis, based on continuous analytical methods such as the detectors classically used in liquid chromatography for instance (Harland and Peppas, 1993;Brown and Chitumbo, 1975;Brown and Johnsen, 1981;Grassi et al, 2001;Wiedemann et al, 1998). Apart from the interest of getting a continuous, automated and monitored signal, a major advantage of this strategy is to prevent volume sampling which is time consuming, may be tricky (particularly for gas phase applications) and complicates data treatment if significant volume changes are operated on the system.…”
Section: Introduction: Fundamentals Of Diffusion Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%