2017
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017012310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor is a sensitive diagnostic test in adult HLH

Abstract: Key Points• The optimal cutoff for soluble interleukin-2 receptor in this study was 2515 U/mL (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 72.5%).• sIL-2r #2400 U/mL is helpful for ruling out HLH (sensitivity, 100%) and .10 000 U/mL is helpful for ruling it in (specificity, 93%). ferritin. The optimal threshold for sIL-2r was 2515 U/mL (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 72.5%). Although there was a large indeterminate range for sIL-2r, a level of 2400 U/mL or less was helpful for ruling out HLH (sensitivity, 100%), and more… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
111
2
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
111
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneously, we also examined the ROC curve of sIL‐2Rα for the diagnosis of L‐HLH in patients with lymphoma; the AUC was 0·94 and the optimal cut‐off was 8033 U/ml, with a highest Youden index of 0·82. The corresponding sensitivity was 94·44% (95% CI, 72·71–99·86%) and the corresponding specificity, 87·18% (95% CI, 72·57–95·70%) (Fig A), values consistent with most other reported results (Lehmberg et al ., ; Hayden et al ., ). Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves demonstrated that there was no significant difference between VSIG4 and sIL‐2Rα for the diagnosis of non‐HLH and L‐HLH in patients with lymphoma ( P = 0·2706, DeLong test).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simultaneously, we also examined the ROC curve of sIL‐2Rα for the diagnosis of L‐HLH in patients with lymphoma; the AUC was 0·94 and the optimal cut‐off was 8033 U/ml, with a highest Youden index of 0·82. The corresponding sensitivity was 94·44% (95% CI, 72·71–99·86%) and the corresponding specificity, 87·18% (95% CI, 72·57–95·70%) (Fig A), values consistent with most other reported results (Lehmberg et al ., ; Hayden et al ., ). Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves demonstrated that there was no significant difference between VSIG4 and sIL‐2Rα for the diagnosis of non‐HLH and L‐HLH in patients with lymphoma ( P = 0·2706, DeLong test).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although a few diagnostic guidelines adopted by certain centres exclude the measurement of sIL-2Ra for the diagnosis of HLH, the HLH-2004 guideline is still the most widely cited one (Hayden et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2017). However, high sIL-2Ra levels are found not only in HLH and/or lymphoma, but also in autoimmune lymphoproliferative disorders, cancers and other conditions associated with T-cell activation such as transplantations (Adams et al, 1989;Foley et al, 1998;Bien & Balcerska, 2008;Hayden et al, 2017). In particular, several studies have revealed that IL-2Ra positive cells exist in some cancer tissues such as breast cancer, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer and metastases to lymph nodes (Murakami, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soluble IL‐2R (sIL‐2R) came back at 10 580 pg/mL (<1033 pg/mL). sIL‐2R levels of >2515 have a 100% sensitivity and 72.5% specificity for the diagnosis of HLH . She was started on dexamethasone with weekly etoposide per the HLH‐94 protocol .…”
Section: Case Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laborparameter, arterielle Blutgasanalysen und SOFA-Score im VerlaufBestimmung von sIL-2R ist in diesen Fällen sehr sinnvoll und zeigte ab Werten von 2,515 U/ml eine Sensitivität von 100 % und eine Spezifität von 72,5 %[9]. Bei Zweifelsfällen zur Diagnose kann der H-Score (http://saintantoine.aphp.…”
unclassified