2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubility of Methane in Water: Some Useful Results for Hydrate Nucleation

Abstract: In this paper, the solubility of methane in water along the 400 bar isobar is determined by computer simulations using the TIP4P/Ice force field for water and a simple LJ model for methane. In particular, the solubility of methane in water when in contact with the gas phase and the solubility of methane in water when in contact with the hydrate has been determined. The solubility of methane in a gas–liquid system decreases as temperature increases. The solubility of methane in a hydrate–liquid system increases… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the salty solution phases contains 26 NaCl and 2304 water molecules (∼3.5 wt % of NaCl). A total of 1200 CO 2 molecules are present in the gas phase, which ensures that the gas phase does not become bubbled during the simulation process because the bubbles will affect the surface tension of the gas and liquid, thus further impacting the hydrate growth process. Water and CO 2 molecules were modeled with TIP4P/Ice and TraPPE force field parameters, , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the salty solution phases contains 26 NaCl and 2304 water molecules (∼3.5 wt % of NaCl). A total of 1200 CO 2 molecules are present in the gas phase, which ensures that the gas phase does not become bubbled during the simulation process because the bubbles will affect the surface tension of the gas and liquid, thus further impacting the hydrate growth process. Water and CO 2 molecules were modeled with TIP4P/Ice and TraPPE force field parameters, , respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All molecular models are rigid in this study. The model parameters for all species have been widely used in hydrate-related studies, ,,, ,, and more details are provided in Table S1. The temperature was controlled using a Nosé-Hoover thermostat with a time constant of 2.0 ps, and the pressure was controlled using an isotropic Parrinello-Rahman barostat with a time constant of 4.0 ps .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87 ■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Solubility within Water Nanodroplets. Since the nucleation events observed in this study involved H 2 S-filled cages almost exclusively, and since nucleation has a strong dependence on the guest concentration, 30,33,65,89 we initiate our investigation by measuring the concentration of H 2 S in the water nanodroplets. We note that for the current systems where a water nanodroplet is immersed in a non-aqueous liquid, the two phases (water/non-aqueous liquid) are in compositional equilibrium; thus, the concentrations of the guest species in the aqueous solution are essentially their saturated values, which represent their solubilities.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,36 Note that this strategy is successful only at low temperatures where the nucleation of gas bubbles occurs in a much larger timescale, as we have shown recently. 51 The second strategy is more subtle. One has a two phase system (water and gas), but instead of having a planar interface, methane molecules form a spherical bubble, which results in an increase of the solubility of methane molecules in the aqueous phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall use the TIP4P/ICE force field 65 for water and the single Lennard-Jones (LJ) site model 66,67 for methane, which are able to provide quite good estimates of T 3 as compared to experiments. 51 To determine J, we shall use the seeding technique. 68 Seeding studies started with the work of Bai and Li; 69,70 it is also in the spirit of the work of Carignano and co-workers 71 and was more officially presented in the work of Knott et al 35 and Sanz et al 14 In the paper of Knott et al, the nucleation rate for the formation of a hydrate was considered, while in the paper of Sanz et al, the nucleation rate for the formation of ice was determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%