1996
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00206-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubility of KFe3(CrO4)2(OH)6 at 4 to 35°C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sorbent minerals used for this experiment were synthesized according to several procedures [13,17,[52][53][54][55][56][57]. No sample of schwertmannite with co-precipitated arsenic was synthesized, instead, a natural sample form the acid mine drainage of Monte Romero mine (Iberian Pyrite Belt, Spain) was used [58].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sorbent minerals used for this experiment were synthesized according to several procedures [13,17,[52][53][54][55][56][57]. No sample of schwertmannite with co-precipitated arsenic was synthesized, instead, a natural sample form the acid mine drainage of Monte Romero mine (Iberian Pyrite Belt, Spain) was used [58].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At pH ~ 3.7, a slight increase in arsenic (7 µg/L), iron (0.96 mg/L), and sulphate (2.5 g/L) concentrations can be interpreted as a minor dissolution that ends when the system normalizes around pH 4. In order to understand the low TLC (~0.81 wt %) compared with values given in the literature (~10 wt %) [56,65], it should be considered that under the Regenspurg method a quick precipitation process could affect the morphology of the grains and subsequently the development of surface area [54]. …”
Section: Arsenic Release From Schwertmannitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, different groups of peaks would appear for each phase, which did not happen. 22 Nature of the decomposition reaction I n o r d e r t o d e t e r m i n e t h e n a t u r e o f t h e decomposition reaction, samples of the solid solution KFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2−x (CrO 4 ) x (OH) 6 were taken and treated with Ca(OH) 2 ; they were analyzed for K + and CrO 4 2− by AAS, and for SO 4 2− by gravimetry, at different times. The solid residues were characterized by SEM-EDS.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The substitution of H 3 O and Na in site A significantly increases the jarosite solubility compared to jarosite with K, while the substitution of chromate by sulfate decreases the solubility of potassium jarosite. 5,22 The most widespread method used to mitigate acid effluents is an active treatment process involving addition of a chemical-neutralizing agent, being lime the most common used agent. Addition of lime to acid mine drainage (AMD) raises its pH, accelerates the rate of chemical oxidation of ferrous iron and causes precipitation of metals present as hydroxides and carbonates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] More recently, studies have detailed the solubility of the chromate analogue and have demonstrated that an ideal solid solution series exists between KFe 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 and KFe 3 (CrO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 . [8,9] The behavior of Cr(III) during jarosite precipitation is less well defined, although the Cr(III) analogues of both hydronium jarosite (H 3 OCr 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 ) and potassium jarosite (KCr 3 (SO 4 ) 2 (OH) 6 ) have been synthesized from chromium sulfate solutions at 300 °C. [10,11] Furthermore, Kolitsch and Pring [12] have reported extensive Cr(III) substitutions in some naturally occurring phosphate and arsenate analogues of jarosite-type compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%