2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40090-019-0184-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubility and absorption rate of CO2 in MEA in the presence of graphene oxide nanoparticle and sodium dodecyl sulfate

Abstract: The aim of this work is to find the effect of the adding graphene oxide nanoparticle ands dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on the absorption rate and solubility of CO 2 in mono-ethanolamine (MEA) solvent. To this end, an experimental setup was designed and constructed to measure the gas solubility in the solvent and the absorption rate during the process. The experiments were conducted at ambient temperature and initial pressure of 20 bar. The parameters analyzed in this paper included GO-NPS at 0.0375, 0.05, 0.075 and 0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was an increase of 3.64% of the CO 2 sorption due to GO nanoparticles. This trend was concurrent with results obtained by Mohammadpour et al . and Irani et al, where the authors investigated the influence of dispersing GO in monoethanolamine and methyl diethanolamine, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was an increase of 3.64% of the CO 2 sorption due to GO nanoparticles. This trend was concurrent with results obtained by Mohammadpour et al . and Irani et al, where the authors investigated the influence of dispersing GO in monoethanolamine and methyl diethanolamine, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Equation was used to calculate the rate of mass transfer of CO 2 into the liquid phase: n t n = k t 0.5 whereby k is defined as an adsorption rate constant, and t is the time in min k was estimated from the slope of the graph of n t / n ∞ versus t 0.5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%