1972
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600610117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubilities of Sulfadiazine, Sulfisomidine, and Sulfadimethoxine in Several Normal Alcohols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data processing was performed using the "Universal Analysis" software supplied with the instrument. c p,sl is frequently estimated using three assumptions, based on empirical evidence; c p,sl =0 (Yalkowsky et al, 1981;Prausnitz et al, 1986), c p,sl =0.5 S fus (Tsonopoulos, 1970) and c p,sl = S fus (Mauger et al, 1972;Grant et al, 1984) which is used in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data processing was performed using the "Universal Analysis" software supplied with the instrument. c p,sl is frequently estimated using three assumptions, based on empirical evidence; c p,sl =0 (Yalkowsky et al, 1981;Prausnitz et al, 1986), c p,sl =0.5 S fus (Tsonopoulos, 1970) and c p,sl = S fus (Mauger et al, 1972;Grant et al, 1984) which is used in this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data processing was performed using the "Universal Analysis" software supplied with the instrument. c p,sl is frequently estimated using one of three assumptions, based on empirical evidence; c p,sl = 0 (Yalkowsky, 1981;, c p,sl = 0.5 S fus (Tsonopoulos, 1970) and c p,sl = S fus (Mauger et al, 1972;Grant et al, 1984). c p,sl = S fus is used in this work, which is calculated using DSC measurements and S fus = H fus /T m .…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different GCMs have been developed (Moller et al, 2008;Myrdal and Yalkowsky, 1997;Nannoolal et al, 2008;Pankow and Asher, 2008) with some being more general and others, such as the EVAPORATION method (Compernolle et al, 2011), having been developed with OA as the target compounds. The Myrdal and Yalkowsky method (Myrdal and Yalkowsky, 1997), the Nannoolal et al method (Nannoolal et al, 2008), and the Moller et al method (Moller et al, 2008) are combined methods requiring a boiling point, T b , as an input. If the T b of a compound is known experimentally it is an advantage, but most atmospherically relevant compounds have an unknown T b so the T b that is used as an input is calculated using a GCM.…”
Section: Vapour Pressure Predictive Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%