1977
DOI: 10.1021/je60074a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubilities of gases in aqueous solutions of amine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 7 together with the data of Sada et al (1977Sada et al ( , 1978. (d) The diffusivity was determined from absorption measurements in a laminar film reactor.…”
Section: Physico-chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 7 together with the data of Sada et al (1977Sada et al ( , 1978. (d) The diffusivity was determined from absorption measurements in a laminar film reactor.…”
Section: Physico-chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) The diffusivity was determined from absorption measurements in a laminar film reactor. The results are presented in Table 8 together with the data of Sada et al (1977Sada et al ( , 1978. The term Hea of the experimental solutions was also determined graphically.…”
Section: Physico-chemicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Sharma, Sada et al, Hikita et al, and Li et al obtained similar rate constants for CO 2 absorption into EDA solutions with different experimental methods. [6][7][8][9] At low amine concentrations (< 2 m) with low CO 2 loadings (< 0.1), EDA has a faster rate of reaction with CO 2 than MEA. At 298 K, the second-order rate constant is 15.1 m 3 mol À1 s À1 for EDA and 7.6 m 3 mol À1 s À1 for MEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nitrous oxide data of Sada et al (1977Sada et al ( , 1968 were used assuming the ratios determined at 298 K are unchanged at 323 K. The concentration of physically dissolved COz in pure water at 323 K and Pco2 = 140 kN/m2 is determined to be 2.67 X mol/cm3, and the diffusivity of COz in pure water at 323 K was set at 3.8 x 10-5 cmz/s, which is the average of two values: 4.1 X by the It should be noted that in the DIPA case, both C* and D decrease precipitously with increasing concentration beyond the 1M level (Sada et al, 1978). Accordingly, the data for the 3M DIPA solution cannot be analyzed further in this study and a question remains unresolved as to whether the observed behavior of 3M DIPA in Figure 6 is due to diffusion limitation or to the Occurrence of third-order kinetics similar to that observed by Nunge and Gill (1963) for the pure DEA system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%