2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.104565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solubilities and diffusion coefficients of carbon dioxide and nitrogen in poly(methyl methacrylate) at high temperatures and pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 40 °C and 30 MPa the PMMA sample contains 22 wt% CO 2 while at 130 °C and 30 MPa it contains 26 wt% CO 2 . These results are quite consistent with values measured by gravimetric methods, as shown in Figure 7 [12], [17].…”
Section: Co 2 Sorption Through Ftir Spectra Recoverysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 40 °C and 30 MPa the PMMA sample contains 22 wt% CO 2 while at 130 °C and 30 MPa it contains 26 wt% CO 2 . These results are quite consistent with values measured by gravimetric methods, as shown in Figure 7 [12], [17].…”
Section: Co 2 Sorption Through Ftir Spectra Recoverysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…CO 2 sorption into polymers can be characterized by various methods or devices : gravimetric method [12], [13], quartz microbalance (QCM) [14], [15], [16] or magnetic suspension balance (MSB) [17], [18]. All of them consist in calculating the mass variation before and after CO 2 saturation but the fast desorption of the sample induces some errors on the % mass CO 2 determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, P i,Gr and P j,PMMA stand for the testing gas permeability coefficient through the i-th and j-th graphene and PMMA layer, respectively. Due to the low values of penetrant concentration expected to occur within the polymeric phases [25], one can reasonably assume that P j,PMMA does not depend significantly upon the position of the specific j-th layer. Moreover, when the number of PMMA/Gr layer sandwiches is sufficiently high to allow a reliable statistically "averaged" approach, one can also assume a unique "average" value for P i,Gr within the system, so that the second equality in Equation (3) holds true.…”
Section: Results Of Permeability Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these calculations are automatically performed by the software governing the apparatus. In the operating conditions of the experiments, since the nitrogen solubility is much smaller than those of oxygen, carbon dioxide and water [22][23][24][25], the effects of nitrogen on the measured permeabilities can be neglected. Tests were performed on 3.5 × 3.5 cm membranes; using adhesive Al masks (standard masks provided by the manufacturer of the permeabilimeter) to reduce the exposed surface, the actual area subjected to the flux was, however, a circle of 2.01 cm 2 .…”
Section: Permeability Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al calculated the diffusion coefficient using the Arrhenius equation [25]. Ushiki et al fitted solubility data for the diffusion coefficient using the Sanchenz-Lancomb equation of state [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%