1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00986199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solitude and intimacy: Linking territoriality and privacy experiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond just solitude, different types of privacy (e.g., intimacy, anonymity) may be achieved in different types of territories. For example, when seeking intimacy with another person, individuals prefer to do so in a primary territory, such as their home, but when they want to be alone, they are actually more likely to prefer temporary public territories, such as a secluded public park (Taylor & Ferguson, 1980). Finally, the inherent nature of a territory may itself facilitate restoration as a product of its relationship with the resident.…”
Section: The Design Of Territories To Facilitate Certain Psychologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond just solitude, different types of privacy (e.g., intimacy, anonymity) may be achieved in different types of territories. For example, when seeking intimacy with another person, individuals prefer to do so in a primary territory, such as their home, but when they want to be alone, they are actually more likely to prefer temporary public territories, such as a secluded public park (Taylor & Ferguson, 1980). Finally, the inherent nature of a territory may itself facilitate restoration as a product of its relationship with the resident.…”
Section: The Design Of Territories To Facilitate Certain Psychologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included the use of auditory screens, headphones, closed doors, and staggered time use. Taylor and Fergusson (1980) found that students sought solitude as another strategy for achieving privacy. He showed that students who had shared accommodation were more likely to seek solitude than were those in single rooms.…”
Section: Privacy Control and Copingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Бројни истраживачи који су се ангажовали на расветљавању coliving феномена усмерили су своја интересовања на анализирање: а) сличности и разлика између термина coliving и cohousing (Vestbro & Horelli, 2012:315;Vestbro, 2010:29;Hoppenbrouwer, 2019:6); б) мотива који подстичу формирање coliving заједница (Pagh, Williams, Braskov, Christensen, 2018); в) концепата заједничког живота за студенте, старије особе или лица са посебним потребама (Spencer, Banerji, 1985;Thomsen, 2008;Bamford, 2005Bamford, , 2004Hudson, 2017;Mathisen, Kofod-Petersen, Olalde, 2012); г) регионалних карактеристика coliving заједница (Ache, Fedrowitz, 2012) и др. Велики број научних радова је посвећен истраживању аспеката приватности и територијалности у животном простору, од којих су за ову тему од извесног значаја студије о психолошким и социолошким аспектима дељених животних простора попут студентског становања (Altman, 1975;Mercer, Benjamin, 1979;Taylor, Fergusson, 1980). (Osborne, 2018).…”
Section: Coliving Cohousingunclassified