2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solitonic in-gap modes in a superconductor-quantum antiferromagnet interface

Abstract: Bound states at interfaces between superconductors and other materials are a powerful tool to characterize the nature of the involved systems, and to engineer elusive quantum excitations. In-gap excitations of conventional s-wave superconductors occur, for instance, at magnetic impurities with net magnetic moment breaking time-reversal symmetry. Here we show that interfaces between a superconductor and a quantum antiferromagnet can host robust in-gap excitations, without breaking time-reversal symmetry. We ill… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chebyshev polynomial-based spectral method is an increasingly popular tool in the simulation of many-body systems that fulfills the requirement of general applicability [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. It relies on the iterative spectral reconstruction of the target functions of interest (e.g., density of states and spin-spin correlations).…”
Section: Chebyshev Spectral Methods: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chebyshev polynomial-based spectral method is an increasingly popular tool in the simulation of many-body systems that fulfills the requirement of general applicability [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. It relies on the iterative spectral reconstruction of the target functions of interest (e.g., density of states and spin-spin correlations).…”
Section: Chebyshev Spectral Methods: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spectral function corresponds to the dynamical spin structure factor for a spin system and the electronic many-body density of states for an electronic system. The dynamical correlator is computed using the tensor-network kernel polynomial algorithm [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. The many-body states and Hamiltonians are represented in terms of a tensor-network, using the matrix-product state formalism [51][52][53], the ground state is computed with the density-matrix renormalization group algorithm [4], and the Hamiltonian is scaled to the interval (−1, 1) to perform the Chebyshev expansion [43].…”
Section: B Dynamical Correlators With Tensor-networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compute the dynamical correlators we will use the tensor network kernel polynomial formalism. [59][60][61][62][63] The kernel polynomial method 59 (KPM) allows for the computation of spectral functions directly in frequency space by performing expansion in terms of Chebyshev polynomials of Eq. 7.…”
Section: B Kernel Polynomial Tensor Network Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%