2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2001)127:1(33)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solitary Wave Runup on Plane Slopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the nonlinear theory the same effects can be found for a particular case of the linearly inclined bay with a parabolic cross-section m = 2 ). The solution of the nonlinear problem in this case can be obtained with the use of the Legendre (hodograph) transformation, which has been very popular for long wave runup on a plane beach (Carrier and Greenspan, 1958;Pedersen and Gjevik, 1983;Synolakis, 1987;Tadepalli and Synolakis, 1996;Li, 2000;Li and Raichlen, 2001;Carrier et al, 2003;Kânoğlu, 2004;Tinti and Tonini, 2005;Kânoğlu and Synolakis, 2006;Didenkulova et al, 2006;2008a;Antuono and Brocchini, 2007;Pritchard and Dickinson, 2007) and is valid for non-breaking waves. In this case the nonlinear system (3) can be reduced to the linear equation (Choi et al, 2008; …”
Section: Traveling Waves In U-shaped Bays With a Arbitrary Varying Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nonlinear theory the same effects can be found for a particular case of the linearly inclined bay with a parabolic cross-section m = 2 ). The solution of the nonlinear problem in this case can be obtained with the use of the Legendre (hodograph) transformation, which has been very popular for long wave runup on a plane beach (Carrier and Greenspan, 1958;Pedersen and Gjevik, 1983;Synolakis, 1987;Tadepalli and Synolakis, 1996;Li, 2000;Li and Raichlen, 2001;Carrier et al, 2003;Kânoğlu, 2004;Tinti and Tonini, 2005;Kânoğlu and Synolakis, 2006;Didenkulova et al, 2006;2008a;Antuono and Brocchini, 2007;Pritchard and Dickinson, 2007) and is valid for non-breaking waves. In this case the nonlinear system (3) can be reduced to the linear equation (Choi et al, 2008; …”
Section: Traveling Waves In U-shaped Bays With a Arbitrary Varying Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dash-dotted line shown separates non-breaking from breaking wave run-up; this has been evaluated using the analysis presented by Synolakis (1986). (The maximum run-up for non-breaking solitary waves was calculated from the nonlinear theory of Li & Raichlen (2001), and that for breaking solitary wave was obtained from the WENO numerical model described herein.) It can be seen in figure 13 that the variation of the maximum run-up with the angle of the slope relative to horizontal is different for non-breaking solitary waves and breaking solitary waves.…”
Section: Shoreline Movement and Maximum Run-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is claimed that the linear and nonlinear theories predict the same maximal values for the run-up height if the incident wave is determined far from the shore (Synolakis, 1987). In contrast, Li and Raichlen (2001) show that there is a difference in the maximum run-up prediction between linear and nonlinear theory. In addition to calculating only the maximum run-up height as in Choi's method, our EBC also includes the calculation of reflected waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The asymptotic solution of this system of equations for wave propagation over sloping bathymetry has been given for several initial-value problems using a hodograph transformation (Carrier and Greenspan, 1958;Synolakis, 1987;Pelinovsky and Mazova, 1992;Carrier et al, 2003;Kânoglu, 2004), and also for the boundary-value problem (Antuono and Brocchini, 2007;Li and Raichlen, 2001;Madsen and Schaffer, 2010) that will be used in this article. Since the system is hyperbolic, it has the following characteristic forms:…”
Section: Characteristic Formmentioning
confidence: 99%