1987
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198707000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solitary Lag Screw Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Fractures of the Angle of the Mandible

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most authors have reported sensory disturbances as an incidental finding or only in patients who subjectively complained about this problem61617. Furthermore, many of these studies included fractures not involving the mandibular canal161718, and others did not address direct injury to the IAN192021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most authors have reported sensory disturbances as an incidental finding or only in patients who subjectively complained about this problem61617. Furthermore, many of these studies included fractures not involving the mandibular canal161718, and others did not address direct injury to the IAN192021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to the plate and screw system is osteosynthesis using only lag screws. It has been shown that mandibular fractures in both the anterior and angle regions can be successfully treated using metal screws [3]. Ellis and Ghali [4] found lag screw fixation of anterior mandibular fractures to be an extremely simple and successful means of rigidly securing bone segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of using a single screw instead of plates and screws are: less implant material; lower costs; a simpler technique; and limited surgical exposure. Since then, the compression screw technique has been widely used for symphyseal fractures 8,24,26 , fractured mandibular angle 16,21 and condyles 8,15,18 . Lag-screws are also used in the midface area 5,10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%