Solitary Kidney with Blind-Ending Ureteral Duplication

Sharma, Swati

doi:10.1159/000472451

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Discussion1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1987

1992

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(11 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Crumplin and Jones [3] considered both anomalies as one entity. This was confirmed by Sharma [9] who stated that both conditions have the same devel opment and are histologically idenical with a normal ureter but with different terminology. Rank et al [8] considered a true diverticulum as a result of over-disten sion of the blind-end of a bifid ureter which is elongated with a course parallel to the ureter.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Blind-Ending Bifid Ureter - Clinical Significance? Analysis of 13 Cases with Review of Literature

Hawas¹,

M²,

Pj³

1987

Eur Urol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Blind-Ending Bifid Ureter - Clinical Significance? Analysis of 13 Cases with Review of Literature

Hawas¹,

M²,

Pj³

1987

Eur Urol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The expression 'uretère bifide à branche borgne' was introduced by Papin [3] in 1927. Under this terminology, many authors [4][5][6][7] grouped together all types of cases: blind-ending bifid ure ters, acquired or congenital diverticula and pyeloureteral duplications. To avoid confusion, an accurate terminol ogy was necessary.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%