2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solidus and liquidus temperatures in the UO2–PuO2 system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(41 reference statements)
3
45
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the limited amount and the high radioactivity of the investigated material, this dataset size was considered to be satisfactory, in that it permitted to obtain significant average values and standard deviations for each composition. The laser pulses lead to maximum temperatures between 3350 K and 3550 K. These temperatures compared with the expected values of the solid/liquid phase transitions for the pure dioxides [21][22][23][24][25]27,29], can be considered to be high enough to melt a sufficient amount of material to obtain a consistent thermal analysis during the cooling stage of the experiments.…”
Section: Laser Meltingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the limited amount and the high radioactivity of the investigated material, this dataset size was considered to be satisfactory, in that it permitted to obtain significant average values and standard deviations for each composition. The laser pulses lead to maximum temperatures between 3350 K and 3550 K. These temperatures compared with the expected values of the solid/liquid phase transitions for the pure dioxides [21][22][23][24][25]27,29], can be considered to be high enough to melt a sufficient amount of material to obtain a consistent thermal analysis during the cooling stage of the experiments.…”
Section: Laser Meltingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The method used for the melting experiments is based on laser heating and a self-crucible approach in order to avoid sample-crucible interactions during the measurements. It was recently applied to UO 2 [21], PuO 2 [22,23], U 1Àx Pu x O 2 [24,25] and MA-doped U 1Àx Pu x O 2 samples [26], and proved to give more accurate values than those previously obtained through more traditional thermal analysis methods [24,25,27]. The samples were also characterised after melting using powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the hypothetical case of no interaction between the solution end-members, assuming that the heat capacity is approximately the same for solid and liquid phases in the vicinity of melting, and taking into account that the only entropy contributions to Gibbs free energy are related to configurational terms, the idealsolution solidus and liquidus lines of the binary phase diagram are solely defined by the melting temperatures and the enthalpies of fusion of the two end members [28] as shown by the dotted lines in figure 7. Actinide dioxide melting enthalpy values assessed by Konings et al [29] are used to calculate the optimised solidus and liquidus plotted in figure 7 together with the current experimental data.…”
Section: Phase Diagram Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, some other researchers [11,[14][15][16][17] [19,20] has the advantages of much shorter heating duration and quasicontainerless conditions and avoids most of the typical problems of traditional furnace techniques. Our MD calculated melting temperature, which lies between 2800 K and 2825 K, is lower than the melting point reported by Bruycker et al [20] and higher than the recommended value by ORNL [17] but matches well with the value reported by Kato et al [19].…”
Section: Enthalpy and Density Variation Of Th Rich (Thu)o2 And (Thpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ThO2 3650-3675 3663 ± 100 Benz et al [6] 3643 ± 30 Rand et al [7] 3573 ± 100 Lambertson et al [8] 3651 ± 17 Ronchi et al [9] 3624 ± 108 Bohler et al [10] UO2 3050-3075 3113 ± 20 Lyon et al [11] 3138 ± 15 Latta et al [12] 3075 ± 30 Ronchi et al [13] 3120 ± 30 Adamson et al [14] 3,113.15 MATPRO [15] 3138 ± 15 Komatsu et al [16] 3120 ± 30 ORNL [17] 3050 ± 55 Böhler et al [18] PuO2 2800-2825 2663 ± 20 Lyon et al [11] 2701 ± 35 Adamson et al [14] 2647 MATPRO [15] 2718 Komatsu et al [16] 2701 ± 35 ORNL [17] 2843 Kato et al [19] Table 4: MD calculated enthalpy increments (in J/mole) of solid and liquid phases of (Th,U)O2 and (Th,Pu)O2 MOX are fitted to equation (7) and (8), respectively and coefficients are enlisted.…”
Section: Calculated Temperature Range (K) Experimental Values (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%