1982
DOI: 10.1179/030634582790427136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solidification of iron-base alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows that the critical strain, using the above method, is sharply decreased from 5.3 to 2.2 % with increases of Ni content from 0.021 to 3.35 % and slowly decreased thereafter. Austenite phases formed during solidification cause larger microsegregation 12,13) due to much lower diffusivities of solute elements in Austenite phases than in Delta ferrite phases. The sharp decrease in critical strain up to ϳ3.5 % Ni may correspond to the fact that residence time during solidification within Delta ferrite phase decreases with increases in Ni content and according to the Fe-Ni phase diagram, the Austenite phase starts to form from Ͼϳ4.1 % Ni.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows that the critical strain, using the above method, is sharply decreased from 5.3 to 2.2 % with increases of Ni content from 0.021 to 3.35 % and slowly decreased thereafter. Austenite phases formed during solidification cause larger microsegregation 12,13) due to much lower diffusivities of solute elements in Austenite phases than in Delta ferrite phases. The sharp decrease in critical strain up to ϳ3.5 % Ni may correspond to the fact that residence time during solidification within Delta ferrite phase decreases with increases in Ni content and according to the Fe-Ni phase diagram, the Austenite phase starts to form from Ͼϳ4.1 % Ni.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Fe-C binary alloy, the relationships between peritectic temperature range and initial carbon content were calculated and the results compared with the ones of a model reported by Fredriksson et al 25) As the calculated conditions, l 1 ϭ250 mm, Dxϭ2.5 mm and R c ϭ0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 K/s were used. Figure 6 shows the relationship between peritectic temperature range, DT p , and the initial carbon content, C 0,C , at Fe-C binary alloys.…”
Section: Peritectic Transformation Of Fe-c and Fe-c-mnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ing solid phase transformation or during peritectic reactions [9,10]. Also, Miyazawa and Schwerdtferger [11] proposed an approach to model the resistance of coherent solid shell against the thermo-mechanical stresses subjected to slab as shown in Figures 3(a) and (b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same approach developed by Rogberg [8], for calculating delta phase of different carbon steel alloys whereas Fredriksson and Stjerndahl [9], approach was used to calculate the different interdendritic liquid and dendritic solid phases dur- …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation