1992
DOI: 10.3817/1293094163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solidarity of the Shaken

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chvatik traces the development of the idea of the solidarity of the shaken, tying it to the experience of the intelligentsia in the Prague Spring of 1968. He notes that Patočka had not then formulated his concept of ‘the solidarity of the shaken, but spoke about a solidarity able to change the world’ (Chvatik 1992, 165). However this view was too idealistic, and the failures of the Prague Spring led Patočka to reconsider idealistic and material forces as a result of self-introspection, and reactions to persecution generated through a process of ‘shaking’.…”
Section: Heretical Conversations With Patočkian Philosophy: the Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chvatik traces the development of the idea of the solidarity of the shaken, tying it to the experience of the intelligentsia in the Prague Spring of 1968. He notes that Patočka had not then formulated his concept of ‘the solidarity of the shaken, but spoke about a solidarity able to change the world’ (Chvatik 1992, 165). However this view was too idealistic, and the failures of the Prague Spring led Patočka to reconsider idealistic and material forces as a result of self-introspection, and reactions to persecution generated through a process of ‘shaking’.…”
Section: Heretical Conversations With Patočkian Philosophy: the Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experts continue to draw his work into mainstream theoretical debates concerned, for the most part, with the tension between ethics and politics (Skilling 1981; Shanks 1995; Lom 1999; Findlay 2002; Tucker 2000). Others, formerly or currently based within the Czech Republic, such as Erazim Kohák, Ivan Chvatik or Martin Palouš, have spent many years refining their own philosophical work, drawing explicitly on the legacy of Patočka (Kohák 1989; Palouš 1990; Chvatik 1992). Moreover, some Patočkian ideas have been touched upon in recent work on philosophy and political theory, particularly evident in the exegeses of Richard Rorty, Jacques Derrida and Paul Ricoeur (Rorty 1991; Derrida 1996; Ricoeur 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%