Solidarity Lost? Labour and the Politics of the Welfare State

Horton, Tim

doi:10.1111/j.1467-923x.2010.02219.x

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These falls in poverty were not continuous; poverty generally fell up to 2004–05, rose for three years in a row and then fell again during the recession up to 2009–10. Labour invested considerable resources in attempting to break the cycle of poverty through early years interventions such as Sure Start, increased child support, asset-based welfare, the minimum wage, pension credits, and tax and national insurance reductions for those on low pay (Gregg 2010; Horton 2010). (Gregg 2010, 21) illustrates that overall redistribution amounted to ‘around 1.5 per cent of GDP by 2008, approximately €22 billion in real terms’.…”

Section: Poverty and Inequalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Globalisation and the Resilience of Social Democracy: Reassessing New Labour's Political Economy

Smith¹

2013

The British Journal of Politics and International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article:• Places New Labour's political economy in historical context using macro-economic data; • Demonstrates that the arguments on policy convergence have led to a simplification of the nuances of Labour's political economy and underestimated its partisan nature; • Highlights how globalisation rather than restraining Labour allowed an unprecedented increase in borrowing and spending making Labour very different to Conservative administrations and more 'old' Labour than previous Labour administrations.There has been considerable debate about the way in which globalisation and neo-liberalism have produced convergence in macro-economic policy. In the British case this convergence is seen in the adoption by the Labour Government (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) of the core elements of Thatcherite economic policy. However, this article argues that that an examination of macro-economic data demonstrates that is difficult to characterise New Labour as neo-liberal and indeed there is some evidence that it shared a number of commonalities with 'Old' Labour. Indeed, in many ways the changing structure of the financial markets removed, to some degree, the shackles from Labour and allowed greater borrowing and spending than previous left of centre administrations. Consequently, as Geoffrey Garrett suggests, partisanship remains an important determinant of economic policy in the UK case.

show abstract

Section: Poverty and Inequalitymentioning

confidence: 99%