Solidarity in Greece and the Management of Difference

Cabot, Heath

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49598-5_11

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…States also sued the federal government over immigration policy, most notably, through United States v. Texas (2016), the case that led President Obama's 2014 effort to expand deferred action to parents of US citizens and lawful permanent residents to be enjoined (Wadhia 2015). Similar dynamics play out internationally as localities express hostility toward asylum seekers, enact sanctuary policies, endorse nationalism, provide humanitarian support, interdict migrants so they cannot reach national territory, or extend the right to vote in local elections (Bauböck 2003;Griffiths, Sigona, and Zetter 2006;Mountz 2011;Griffiths 2014;Bauder 2017;Cabot 2020;De Graauw 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Adminigration: City-Level Governance of Immigrant Community Members

Coutin,

Nicholls

2023

Law Soc. Inq.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of adminigration provides a much-needed lens in theorizing immigration enforcement, citizenship, and urban geographies. We define adminigration as the governance of immigrant community members through city-level policies and programs, whether or not these explicitly focus on immigrants. Our focus on adminigration involves three theoretical interventions: (1) bridging literature on immigrant bureaucratic incorporation and crimmigration to situate city-level administrative practices within immigration policymaking; (2) a focus on how localized definitions of membership, as enacted by cities, produce citizenship, legality, and illegality, and (3) the argument that these practices play out in space, resulting in variegated urban landscapes that are better characterized as a network than a level. We develop these points through a review of the literature on bureaucratic incorporation, crimmigration, citizenship, and the spatialization of immigration policymaking. To illustrate the utility of this framework, we conclude with a case study of adminigration in a California city that we call “Mayville.”

show abstract