2008
DOI: 10.1038/nature07295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-state quantum memory using the 31P nuclear spin

Abstract: The transfer of information between different physical forms is a central theme in communication and computation, for example between processing entities and memory. Nowhere is this more crucial than in quantum computation [1], where great effort must be taken to protect the integrity of a fragile quantum bit (qubit) [2]. However, transfer of quantum information is particularly challenging, as the process must remain coherent at all times to preserve the quantum nature of the information [3]. Here we demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
398
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(42 reference statements)
6
398
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that, whilst long, the T n 2 we measure is nonetheless shorter than has been previously measured for donors in silicon using conventional means 7 . A number of processes exist which limit T n 2 in those measurements, but the fundamental limit seems to be the lifetime of the hyperfine coupled donor electron 7,24 : T n 2 ≤ 2T e 1 .…”
Section: Charge Carrier Induced Decoherencementioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that, whilst long, the T n 2 we measure is nonetheless shorter than has been previously measured for donors in silicon using conventional means 7 . A number of processes exist which limit T n 2 in those measurements, but the fundamental limit seems to be the lifetime of the hyperfine coupled donor electron 7,24 : T n 2 ≤ 2T e 1 .…”
Section: Charge Carrier Induced Decoherencementioning
confidence: 73%
“…A number of processes exist which limit T n 2 in those measurements, but the fundamental limit seems to be the lifetime of the hyperfine coupled donor electron 7,24 : T n 2 ≤ 2T e 1 . In the experiments reported here, the nuclear coherence time measured is indeed very close to twice the spin lifetime of the coupled donor electron, T n 2 = 2.8 ± 0.4 ms ≈ 2T e 1 = 3.72 ± 0.04 ms [dashed line, Fig.…”
Section: Charge Carrier Induced Decoherencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These limits could be overcome by re-initialising the ancilla or, if additional ancillas (such as nearby 13 C spins) are available, by repeating the algorithm with fresh ancillas, or by concatenating layers of protections against multi-axis noise (see Methods). Moreover, our scheme is more flexible than other protection schemes, including coherent transfer to the ancilla qubit [24], as it still allows applying some gate operations on the qubit [16]. For example, in our implementation the qubit was still evolving under the action of the hyperfine coupling, as indicated by the coherent oscillations of the fidelity (these oscillations could be removed e.g.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%