2022
DOI: 10.1002/asia.202200775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid‐state Nanopores: Chemical Modifications, Interactions, and Functionalities

Abstract: Nanopore technology is a burgeoning detection technology for single-molecular sensing and ion rectification. Solid-state nanopores have attracted more and more attention because of their higher stability and tunability than biological nanopores. However, solid-state nanopores still suffer the drawbacks of low signal-to-noise ratio and low resolution, which hinder their practical applications. Thus, developing operatical and useful methods to overcome the shortages of solid-state nanopores is urgently needed. H… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 211 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25−27 However, due to its low signal-to-noise ratio and low resolution, the solid-state nanopores cannot fully discriminate between individual monosaccharides or polysaccharides. 28 Three biological nanopore, Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA), aerolysin (AeL), and α-hemolysin (α-HL) nanopore permit the detection of glycans. 29−33 Phenylboronic acid-appended hetero-octameric MspA nanopore has recently been exploited for the detection of nine types of monosaccharides and the identification of polyol sweeteners.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25−27 However, due to its low signal-to-noise ratio and low resolution, the solid-state nanopores cannot fully discriminate between individual monosaccharides or polysaccharides. 28 Three biological nanopore, Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA), aerolysin (AeL), and α-hemolysin (α-HL) nanopore permit the detection of glycans. 29−33 Phenylboronic acid-appended hetero-octameric MspA nanopore has recently been exploited for the detection of nine types of monosaccharides and the identification of polyol sweeteners.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have been reported on the nanopore detection of glycans, suggesting that nanopores have great potential to manage this task. For example, solid-state nanopores have been applied to detect the glycosaminoglycans, polysaccharides, and glycoproteins. However, due to its low signal-to-noise ratio and low resolution, the solid-state nanopores cannot fully discriminate between individual monosaccharides or polysaccharides . Three biological nanopore, Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A (MspA), aerolysin (AeL), and α-hemolysin (α-HL) nanopore permit the detection of glycans. Phenylboronic acid-appended hetero-octameric MspA nanopore has recently been exploited for the detection of nine types of monosaccharides and the identification of polyol sweeteners. , Engineered α-HL has been used to detect isomers of d -glucose, d -fructose, or cyclodextrins. To the best of our knowledge, mapping the functional groups of glycans and identifying oligosaccharides via functional group patterns using nanopores have not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The passage of small analytes through the large lumen of a solid‐state nanopore can occur too rapidly to yield measurable signals. To overcome this issue, molecular modifications [75] and nanobeads [76] have been incorporated in the pores to slow translocation. A further limitation of solid‐state nanopores is associated with the wide lumen and inconsistent lumen geometry which hinders the generation of reproducible signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion current rectification ratio has been widely used as a signal output for the qualitative and quantitative detection of various analytes. Despite many attempts to reduce noise and improve resolution, solid-state nanopore sensors still have lower sensitivity and poorer selectivity than biological nanopore sensors …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%