“…X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the functional groups present on the surface of the MCS and MCSC. Figure S18 shows the survey spectra of MCS and MCSC, combined with the results of TGA (Figure c), which reveals that MCS includes the elements Si and O, while the MCSC includes the elements Si, O, and C. As displayed in Figure d, the Si 2p peak at 102.9 eV in MCSC and 103.3 eV in MCS are attributed to the Si–O bond. ,, For O 1s (Figure e), the peaks from MCSC at 531.98, 532.28, and 532.88 eV are attributed to the binding energies of the Si–O–C, −OH, and Si–O–CO bonds, respectively; while the peaks from MCS at 532.98 and 532.28 eV are attributed to the binding energies of the Si–O–Si and Si–OH, respectively. , Finally, the high-resolution spectrum of C 1s can be deconvoluted to three peaks at 289.48, 285.78, and 284.78 eV (Figure f), which correspond to −COOH, C–O, and C–C, respectively . Based on the results of XPS, it can be confirmed that the −COOH group was formed on the surface of the MCSC because the Resol-based phenolic resins were oxidized during pyrolysis, which leads to a higher surface charge density (calculated according to the equations in Supporting Infomation (SI)) and pH-sensitive performance (Figure S19 and Table S6).…”