Humic Substances in the Aquatic and Terrestrial Environment
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0010470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid state 13C CP MAS NMR characterization of the chemical structure of terrestrial organic matter from areas with differing vegetational backgrounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Krosshavn et al (1989) have postulated that vegetation background (source of organic residue) and degree of decay are important factors influencing the chemical structure of SOM, and that vegetation background is the more important of the two. The alkyl C, carboxyl C and carbonyl C structural groups were more strongly expressed, and carbohydrate and protein-like structures were lower in soil than in litter and fine roots ( lignin structures was similar in both the precursors and SOM, as was the calculated aromaticity.…”
Section: Litter and Fine Roots In Relation To The S O M On The Nativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Krosshavn et al (1989) have postulated that vegetation background (source of organic residue) and degree of decay are important factors influencing the chemical structure of SOM, and that vegetation background is the more important of the two. The alkyl C, carboxyl C and carbonyl C structural groups were more strongly expressed, and carbohydrate and protein-like structures were lower in soil than in litter and fine roots ( lignin structures was similar in both the precursors and SOM, as was the calculated aromaticity.…”
Section: Litter and Fine Roots In Relation To The S O M On The Nativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work the chemical composition of whole soil samples was studied by solid-state I3C CP MAS NMR (Preston & Ripmeester, 1982;Wilson et al, 1983;Ogner, 1985;Kogel-Knabner et al, 1988;Oades et al, 1988). The humus samples were partly selected with respect to differences in their vegetational origin, and partly with respect to variation in the degree of decomposition of the organic matter (Swift et al, 1979;Mathur & Farnham, 1985;Hatcher et al, 1986;Frund & Ludemann, 1989;Frund et al, 1989;Krosshavn et al, 1990;Ranger et al, 1990;Krosshavn et al, 1991). The results indicate a significant influence of vegetational background and degree of decomposition on the chemical composition of soil, in contrast to an earlier investigation where this relationship was assumed but not confirmed (Krosshavn et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this investigation was to find out whether isolation and separation of humic substances change the chemical composition of soil. Whole soil, humic acids, fulvic acids and humin were examined with solid-state I3C CP MAS NMR (Preston & Ripmeester, 1982;Ogner, 1985;Hempfling et al, 1987;Krosshavn et al, 1991). The soil samples were selected with respect to differences in their vegetational cover in order to find out whether humus fractionation affects the chemical structure of soil differently according to variation in their vegetational background (Wilson et al, 1981;Friind & Liidemann, 1989;Friind et a/., 1989;Krosshavn et al, 1990;Ranger et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%