1979
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400026140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-phase radioimmunoassay techniques for the detection of African swine fever antigen and antibody

Abstract: SUMMARYA solid phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) has been successfully developed to measure both African swine fever virus (ASFV) antigen and antibody. Studies show that the assay is reproducible and will detect limiting antigen concentrations equivalent to 50-500 HAD50/ml. Both direct and indirect antibody RIA have been developed and have proved to be approximately 100 times more sensitive than the complement fixation test at present available and 1000 times more sensitive than the immuno-electro-osmophoresis test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In endemic areas, diagnosis may be based on detection of antibody but in new introductions of disease it is preferable to detect the virus. Procedures, which have been used for ASF virus antigen detection, include the traditional haemadsorption test (HAD; [ 9 ], radioimmunoassay (RIA; [ 10 ];, direct immunofluorescence [ 11 ] and polymerase chain reaction (PCR; [ 12 - 14 ] and recently LAMP [ 15 ]. Immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization have been described in studies of disease pathogenesis [ 16 ], but these techniques are not ideally suited to routine diagnosis [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In endemic areas, diagnosis may be based on detection of antibody but in new introductions of disease it is preferable to detect the virus. Procedures, which have been used for ASF virus antigen detection, include the traditional haemadsorption test (HAD; [ 9 ], radioimmunoassay (RIA; [ 10 ];, direct immunofluorescence [ 11 ] and polymerase chain reaction (PCR; [ 12 - 14 ] and recently LAMP [ 15 ]. Immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization have been described in studies of disease pathogenesis [ 16 ], but these techniques are not ideally suited to routine diagnosis [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viruses could be grouped according to their ability to compete with the homologous virus, and statistically significant differences between virus “groups” were observed. The results of a comparison of the relationships between the viruses using RIA and complement fixation tests did not always correlate (Crowther et al 1979 ). RNA competition hybridization using 32 P-labeled RNA and competitive radioimmunoassays with 35 S-labeled viruses were used to compare the biochemical and serological characteristics of five isolate of FMD, serotype A (Robson et al 1979 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzyme immunoassays, immunoblotting, and indirect fluorescent antibody tests have all been used in diagnosis. Solid phase RIA using microtiter plates and 125 I-labeled IgG has been used to detect both viral antigen and antibody (Crowther et al 1979 ) and was shown to be 1,000 times more sensitive than an immune-electro-osmophoresis test for detection of ASFV antibody. RIA detected antibodies within 3–4 days of infection, in contrast with the gel diffusion tests that was not positive until 10 days post-infection (Wardley and Wilkinson 1980 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swine infected with ASFV develop anti-viral antibodies that can be demonstrated from 7 days post-infection (p.i.) by a wide variety of tests (Cowan, 1961 ; Crowther et al , 1979 ; Hamdy et al , 1981 ; Malmquist, 1963 ; Pan et al , 1972 , 1974 , 1982 ; Parker & Plowright, 1968 ). Pigs that recover are usually resistant to challenge with homologous, but not heterologous, virus isolates (Ruiz-Gonzalvo et al , 1986 ; Schlafer et al , 1984 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%