2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid phase extraction using silica gel modified with murexide for preconcentration of uranium (VI) ions from water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…± SD (n = 3) U 2.68 ± 0.12 2.63± 0.15 Table 6 compare the proposed method with the other extraction methods for the determination of the target analyte in water samples. The quantitative results of the proposed method are better than of solid phase extraction [10,34] and DLLME [35]. The comparison of extraction time of the proposed method with cloud-point extraction [33] for the extraction of the target analyte indicates that this method has a short extraction time.…”
Section: Analysis Of Real Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…± SD (n = 3) U 2.68 ± 0.12 2.63± 0.15 Table 6 compare the proposed method with the other extraction methods for the determination of the target analyte in water samples. The quantitative results of the proposed method are better than of solid phase extraction [10,34] and DLLME [35]. The comparison of extraction time of the proposed method with cloud-point extraction [33] for the extraction of the target analyte indicates that this method has a short extraction time.…”
Section: Analysis Of Real Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…High concentrations of Tl (up to 490 ppm) in the PMD. Tl is not common but is commonly associated with Carlin-type gold deposits that have a close proximity to Eocene volcanic centers or plutons [92][93][94][95][96]. Thus, the Tl and Au detected in the PMD could support an intrusion.…”
Section: Mineral Paragenesis Pmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of other methods such as precipitation, solvent extraction, electrolysis and ion exchange have been employed to remove dissolved metals from aqueous samples. Most of these have disadvantages such as poor removal efficiency, high cost, and generation of secondary pollutants and ineffectiveness for low concentration removal [93]. We are testing contaminated water from wells on the Navajo Reservation and using these SPCs as a potential method of remediation through various bench scale studies.…”
Section: Selective Solid Phase Extraction Of U From Contaminated Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure for preparation of the new sorbent includes three steps as follows; in the first step, activation of 25.0 g of silica gel surface was accomplished by reflux in 6.0 mol/L hydrochloric acid for 24 h. Then the product was filtered and repeatedly washed with doubly distilled water and finally dried in an oven at 160°C for 8 h. In the second step, 20.0 g of the activated silica gel was suspended in 200 mL of dry toluene containing 22.5 mL of 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (CPMS) as silylating reagent and refluxed for 12 h. At the end of this time, the modified silica gel (SiCPMS) was filtered off, washed with toluene, ethanol and diethyl ether, respectively, to remove possible trace amounts of the reagent and dried at 70°C for 6 h [45].…”
Section: Preparation Of the Modified Silica Gelmentioning
confidence: 99%